Greek logic may
have later influenced monotheistic thought; however, it has
everything positive to claim in this respect. Otherwise, the
religious institutions that followed would not have burnt traces
of the Greek influence from the texts in their attempt to invest
in dogma as a fertile ground for gaining mass politics and
wealth.
Burning and
banning became a religious trademark ever since. For instance,
in the Ancient Christian Times, the Druze Order of the
Sacred Five incarnated in the persons of:
Jesus Christ,
John the Baptist, Mathew,
Marcus & Locus.
The
Druze are advised to read the books of those five sacred men. On
the other hand, they are prevented from reading the works of
Saint Paul and Peter. The original message of the Five Christian
Figures mentioned above had little to do with anything similar
to what Christianity at Large turned out to be several centuries
A.D. Traces of early Christianity that is faithful to the Spirit
of Jesus Christ and his Enclosed Circle is historically
documented to have been removed from the bible by the notorious
Council of Nicea at Constantinople under the
sponsorship of Constantine, and the Christians who protested
this council were burnt to death or chased after for years to
come, often referred to as Heretics and Witches, and who is to
forget what Pope Innocent III did with the Cathars in France
centuries later!!!
After all, why
should any religious or political institution approve of the
Gnostic Doctrines - doctrines that are hard to invest in
politically - dangerous doctrines like Reincarnation that
eternally frees its followers from purchasing expensive holy
tickets to Heaven. Even still, till this very moment, many
people of many nations and cultures, under the spell of their
religious leadership, are willing to purchase highly expensive
tickets to heaven, even if the price meant their own blood...
In the Ancient Greek times the
Order of the Sacred Five incarnated in the persons of: Pythagoras,
Plato,
Aristotle,
Parmenides
&
Plotinus.
The 3 subsidiaries incarnated as Socrates, Democritus and
Empedocles...
According to the Druze, the same
man who came in ancient Greek times as
Pythagoras
and
taught his students the mysteries of the number ONE, came
centuries later as
Jesus Christ to
reveal to them the Divine Identity of the LORD ONE, and before
then as King
Solomon
and
later as
Jethro
and the Angel
Gabriel
who (according to the Druze Doctrines) was not a ghost but an
actual man otherwise known as
Salman El-Farisi...
3, The Druze
Sacred Limits:
The Druze divide
their prophets into a hierarchy of 5 main Prophets and another
hierarchy of 3 subsidiary Prophets. They refer to those prophets
as El-Hodoud which is an Arabic term that means LIMITS.
The Order of the
Main Five Limits:
KINGDOM OF
HEAVEN AND THE ANCIENT ORDER OF SPIRITUAL TRINITY:
The initial 3 of
the main five Druze Limits constitute The Kingdom of Heaven.
They represent The Sacred Order of The Spiritual Trinity
and are symbolized by the uppermost 3 colors of the Druze flag:
Green,
Red
&
Yellow.
The Wholly Mind
- The Wholly Soul -
The Wholly Word
(also
known as Adam, Enoch and Seth):
The Wholly Mind
= The PEN =
Incarnated across history as Adam / Pythagoras / King Solomon /
Jethro / Confucius / Jesus Christ / Salman El-Farisi / Hamza Ibn
Ali to name a few etc...
The Wholly Soul
= The TABLET =
Symbolized by EVE & Incarnated as Emhoteb / Enoch / Hermes /
Azriel / Plato / John the Baptist / Abou Ibrahim to name a
few...
The Wholly Word
= The WRITTEN
WORD = Incarnated as Seth / Aristotle / Mathew to name a few...
KINGDOM OF EARTH
AND THE ANCIENT ORDER OF DUALITY:
The remaining 2
among the five constitute the Kingdom of Earth. They represent
the DIVINE Order of Duality and are symbolized by the lower 2
colors of the Druze flag: Blue & White
The Antecedent
They are
referred to as the Antecedent & The Successor. They signify two
Adamic Powers known as Potentiality or Will & Actuality or
Action. It is mentioned in The Druze Wisdom that the
majority of humanity has only reached knowledge of the the
sacred earthly two and never of the sacred heavenly trinity; and
it is also mentioned that humanity across the ages has mistaken
the
Antecedent
for being the
Wholly Mind
(The Christ of the Ages). Their two
colors Blue & White signify the Manifestation of the Power of
the Heavenly kingdom on earth, and I personally believe that it
is not by accident that those two colors are colors adopted by
many flags around the world - like the Greek flag for example.
The
Antecedent
The POWER of the
kingdom in Potentiality = The WILL = Incarnated as Parmenides /
Marcus to name a few...
The POWER of the
Kingdom
in Actuality = The ACTION = Incarnated as Alexander the Great /
Plotinus
/ Locus
to name a few
The Order of the
Subsidiary Three Limits:
3, THE THIRD
REPRESENT THE POWER OF IMAGINATION (El-Khayal): the first step
on the path of knowledge is to ask through imagination -
2, THE SECOND
REPRESENT THE POWER OF THE OPENING (El-Fath): the door of
knowledge opens
1, THE FIRST
REPRESENT THE POWER OF THE ENTERING (El-Jad): the force of
knowledge pushes the seeker into an entrance
4, The Gnostic
Significance of The Sacred Limits:
The Druze refer
to the Eight Sacred Order as EL-Hdoud. El-Hdoud is
the Arabic term for LIMITS or Boundaries, and they are referred
to as such in reference to what KNOWLEDGE or GNOSIS signifies in
terms of drawing Limits to The LIMITLESS nature of ABSOLUTE
EXISTENCE; and thus, each Limit signifies a Realm of
Knowledge ruled by its own mathematics and language.
According to the
Ancient Druze Wisdom, the Original Cause of Creation is GNOSIS
(knowledge). This Cause justifies the nature of the 1st Creature
ever created, THE WHOLLY MIND.
Before going on
exploring the logic of the Spiritual Creation, it is worth
mentioning that the Druze could be considered as Surviving
Gnostics who have successfully managed to preserve the
wisdom of the Original Cause (GNOSIS) across space & time, and I
have enough insight to consider ancient communities like the
Essenes of The Dead Sea, The Druids of Ancient Ireland and The
Cathars of Ancient France, The Nondualists of Ancient India (to
name a few) as authentic Gnostics as well who were persecuted at
their times (as were the Pythagoreans before them) for believing
in similar doctrines that "we" the Druze believe in today -
doctrines which have somehow always paused as a threat to the
political leadership of every day and age.
The enlightened
among the Druze consider their gathering under the Druze name
and flag since 1000yrs ago as merely one chapter of their very
ancient history as Carriers of the Gnostic Flame ever
since Atlantis and even before.
Accordingly,
ancient Gnostic Sages like
Hermes Trismegistos
and
Seth
are
sacred to the Druze. They are members of their Sacred Order
of Eight who reincarnate in every day and age under
different names and whose doctrines are essential part of the
Ancient Druze Wisdom.
" I Know you,
yet you Know not me, and you know not yourselves..." (The Words
of The Wholly Mind)
This excerpt
from the Ancient Druze Wisdom refer to the extent humans
are forgetful of their countless reincarnations across time -
millions of names and identities that only survive in the Book
of Life - Inside the records of the Wholly Mind.
5, The Gnostic
Nature of the Cause of Creation
The
words
of THE CREATOR in Eternity prior to the Creation of Space
&
Time:
"I was a hidden treasure, I wished to be known,
and thus, I created Adamics and through me they came to know
me..."
(The Ancient Druze Wisdom)
Our Holy
PYTHAGORAS
(blessed
be his name) compared the universe to ONE GIANT UNIVERSAL
PERSON. This Universal Person (that religions later associated
with the concept of THE GOD), prior to creation, is compared in
the Ancient Druze Wisdom to:
"A very
beautiful girl locked in her room with a mirror, where there is
no existence of AN OTHER to know of her rare beauty but
herself..."
However,
there comes a time when BEAUTY REVOLTS,
And THE CREATOR,
in HIS primeval inconceivable EXISTENCE, is said to have
revolted over the immaculacy of his Ascended Ineffable Beauty
and WISHED TO DESCEND TO THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE AND BE KNOWN...
and thus, HE is
said to have Created a form of Existence that is relative
to the nature of HIS WISH:
KNOWLEDGE!!
Gnosis or
Knowledge, in its very essential nature, is ruled by the duality
of:
The Knower
and The Object of knowledge
In other words,
in order for the ABSOLUTE & LIMITLESS to be known, part of it
had to depart the Absolute Unity and descend down towards the
Duality that characterizes the nature of knowledge...
From HIS own
SELF the Creator creates on one hand a A RELATIVELY LIMITED
OTHER to know HIM, and on the other hand appears to this OTHER
in a RELATIVELY LIMITED KNOWLEDGEABLE FORM...
From HIS SELF to
HIS SELF
Accordingly,
from the Creator's Limitless Self, springs forth on one hand
A Knower Self, and on the other hand A Knowledgeable Self.
This is the
Original Logic behind the theological conception of The
Sacred Trinity:
The 1st
Sacred Order of Trinity to have resulted from this Original
Act of Creation:
1, The Creator's
Ineffable Self (Beyond Knowledge),
2, The Creator's Knower Self,
3, The Creator's Knowledgeable Self.
From the
Creator's Absolute Lahouti SELF sprang forth on one hand, an EYE
(The Wholly MIND) as the 1st and Ultimate Knower-Self of the
Creator, and on the other hand The Nasouti Image (A God Image)
as the 1st and Ultimate Object of Knowledge - The Ultimate
Knowledgeable Self of the Creator - The Image that the Creator
chose to appear in to this Eye - HIS SELF-IMAGE.
In Creating the
Possibility of Knowledge of HIS ineffable SELF, the
CREATOR creates LIMITS to His Limitless Identity.
However, those
Limits are not to be mistaken for being Limits to THE CREATOR'S
LAHOUTI SELF (His Absolute Ineffable Self). The Lahouti Self
of the Creator remains Transcendent (beyond Imagination or
Conception).
One religious
school of thought (usually referred to as The People who are
faithful to the Text) stop at this image of the Creator (as
being transcendent beyond mental conception), and consider any
attempt to conceive of the Creator otherwise as purely sinful.
Accordingly,
the role of the Messenger
of God (The Messiah) from the perspective of
this school of thought is automatically severed from any direct
relationship to The Creator or The Process of
Creation, and rather limited to a passive receiver of the
Word of God embodied in The Holy Text (that is not open
for interpretation even by the Messiah himself).
This theological school of
thought is referred to as "Tanzeel", and it completely rules
out the role that the Mind plays in the process of Creation.
On the other
hand, there is another theological school of thought that does
just the opposite. They consider the Messiah to be The
manifestation of the Creator on Earth - so much so that the
Messiah himself is almost worshipped as God and in certain cases
referred to as such. Accordingly, the Holy Message somehow
wholly revolves around the person considered to be the Messiah
and is consequently more open to interpretive efforts dictated
by the Messiah and/or his entrusted circle. This school of
thought is referred to as "Taaweel".
The Gnostics
school of Thought finds a middle ground between the two
predominant schools of thought in the sense that the Wholly Mind
(The Messiah) represents the Image of the Creator, yet he should
not be mistaken for the Creator himself. The Wholly Mind shares
in the Creation Process in as much as he reflects the Power of
the Creator... This idea will become clearer as we go along.
The Creator's
LAHOUTI SELF reflects a form of ABSOLUTE ONENESS that is beyond
the DUAL nature of Knowledge... The Gnostic Limits are rather
meant as THE PATH to Knowledge of The Creator's Nasouti Self,
which is The Path of fulfilling The Gnostic Cause of
Existence: God's Eternal Wish to be Known.
The Nasouti Self
of God is the Creator's Knowledgeable SELF - the Self that first
appeared to the Wholly Mind (ADAM) in Adam's Liking and spoke to
Adam in the Adamic language he could understand.
Note that this
is basically the skeletal logic that supports the religious
emphasis on the Adamic Image as the most holy and sacred of
images - being the image that The Creator chose to appear in
when he chose to be known...
According to the
Druze Wisdom, knowledge of the Sacred Limits and what
they signify in The Creator's KINGDOM is the only Path to the
kind of SANCTIFYING KNOWLEDGE that justifies the Adamic
existence altogether...
The first and
foremost Limit, The Wholly Mind, otherwise known as The DOOR to
the Creator, is the medium without which no human soul could
enter the Creator's kingdom; He is also known as The PEN of the
Creator and The Shield behind which The CREATOR enters his
Creation yet preserves HIS transcendence.
"I am the First
and the last, The Alpha and the Omega, The Beginning and The
End..."
(The Words of the Wholly Mind in the Biblical Account)
In the Druze
Texts, The Creator directs his words to The Wholly Mind saying:
"He who
obeys you obeys me, and he who disobeys you disobeys me...
Through you I reward and through you I punish..."
(The Ancient Druze Wisdom)
The Mind is the
tool of Eternal Punishment or Eternal Reward inside each one of
us. It is a double-edged sward.
Seeking
knowledge of the Creator without knocking on The Door (The
Wholly Mind) is like seeking knowledge that is beyond the Mind's
limits.
Such knowledge
or lack of it cannot be differentiated from utter ignorance; it
is like seeking sight of an object that has no dimensional
extremities or form, it might as well not exist altogether, or
like forever chasing after the unknown, trading what you know
for what you don't or constantly looking out for a blurred
future on the expense of a lucid present...
On the other
hand, seeking the Creator through the LIMITS is like seeking the
Creator through YOUR OWN ADAMIC POWERS - through your own mind,
your own thoughts, your own actions.
Once you
understand the logic that rules those Adamic powers (which you
refer to as THY SELF) you arrive at a form of knowledge so
sanctifying and so relevant to you - so vibrant with meaning
that it translates pure VISION of The Creator in every aspect of
YOU, YOUR SELF & YOUR LIFE HAPPENINGS.
It translates
pure happiness and determination right here right now and
not a promise to happiness in some unknown future. This
Translation resembles The Creator's Eternally Alive nature which
has not happened in the past or waiting to happen in a
future; it is always in the Circle of Happening.
It is no
coincidence that the term Happ-iness and the term Happ-ening
bare resemblance to one another...
"In each hour HE
(The Creator) is on to an affair, and no particular affair
distract HIM from another..."
(The Ancient
Druze Wisdom).
To know the
logic behind WHAT HAPPENS at any given time, despite the 1000s
of other LIMITLESS possibilities of WHAT COULD HAVE OTHERWISE
HAPPENED !!! One is completely fulfilled, secured and encircled
by such knowledge that one possesses no PRESSURE TO KNOW,
no artificial awareness to knowledge as an end in itself but
only as a silent obedient servant of MEANING & FORM.
Later on, it
will become clear how this PRESSURE TO KNOW is an Erroneous
Tendency of the Soul that is responsible for what is
symbolically described as the Adamic Fall from Eden which
resulted from Eating from the Tree of Knowledge.
Consider the
simple maxim: KNOW THY LIMITS in any domain of
responsibility, be it a job, a duty or merely an activity that
one might engage in. One is so secured by the implications of
such maxim, even more than one is willing to admit to.
No one really
enjoys carrying a burden or responsibility beyond his/her
ability to bare; yet the majority of humans are tempted to play
the role of the Hero THE SAVIOR even on the expense of
their own SALVATION.
Knowing Thy
Limits
has thus become a Forbidden Simplicity. People as a result die
thousands of times while they are alive trying to seek limits to
their limitless temptation to Play Roles and Hold
Responsibilities beyond their selves and nourish their egos by
the poisoned flesh of that ancient Apple.
To know thy
limits on the other hand, is like knowing while dreaming that
you are dreaming (else known as LUCID dreaming); such knowledge
makes one in such full charge of the dream events and forever
secured by the possibility that one possesses the power to wake
up at anytime he/she wishes.
To Know Thy
Limits
is to be content
with who you are and what happens to you at any given time which
means to be encircled by meaning at all times in all
situations, in your strengths and in your weaknesses, in your
moments of honor and in your moments of shame, in your moments
of tribulations and in your moments of joy...
to not fear the
future, and not fearing the future is a very ancient art that
depends less on what you are prepared to know and more on what
you are prepared let go of..... This is the basic mathematics of
eternal happiness HERE ON EARTH...
NOTE for now
that playing the role of THE SAVIOR is the inner most temptation
of the ILL SOUL - the ILL EVE (Eve-Ill) - The Psyche.
This blind
temptation is biblically associated with THE ANTI CHRIST, and
its mathematics constitutes the Nature of The Original Sin, as
it will become clear that Jesus Christ The Savior Himself
never nourished such temptation.
In conclusion,
The Creator created the nature of the Wholly MIND as purely
reflective in its nature of HIS SACRED NATURE.
The Creator
subjected HIS limitless Inconceivable Existence to the LAW OF
THE MIND, through appearing to Adam in an Image of Adam's
liking. The perfection embodied through the Wholly Mind's Adamic
Image is so reflective of GOD's Nasouti Image that the Wholly
Mind, in all His incarnations, never stops reflecting THE
CREATIVE POWER OF THE CREATOR not for a second and is often
mistaken for God Himself, especially in the Christian Times.
He is the Christ
of
the Christian Times, the
Pythagoras
of
the ancient Greek times, the
King
Solomon
of
the Judaic times, the
Angel Gabriel
of
the Moslem times - to name a few incarnations of His...
Yes, the Wholly
Mind, Adam, along with the rest of El-Hudoud, is incarnated in
every day and age in flesh and blood and in fulfillment of the
Law of Knowledge.
For, The Law
mandates that any identity, in order to be knowledgeable, must
possess an expressive form to account for its knowledge-ability,
and the identity of any Adamic EVEN CHRIST HIMSELF is no
exception.
However, if
there is a Creature on earth that projects pure LIGHT, PURE
MIND, PURE HOLINESS, He must be The Person of the Wholly Mind
Himself - He who came in every day and age wearing a different
body and under a different name. He is the most ascended being
to have ever walked the face of the earth...
The Sacred
Limits, in their earthly Adamic presence, reflect the heavenly
Kingdom of God on earth.
By encountering
them in person across one's countless incarnations in space &
time and recognizing who they are and what they stand for in the
KINGDOM OF GNOSIS and the spirit that inspires their Adamic
expressions and actions on earth, one recollects knowledge of
the Edenic Experience where ADAM & THE CREATOR never stop being
together as ONE.
In their humble
and knowledgeable form as Adamics, the sacred limits embody the
Will of God to subject HIS Immaculate LAW to the humble nature
of Adam.
This is the
logic behind The Creator creating Adam in His liking... The
Adamic Image is thus the most Holy Image ever created, because
GOD chose to appear in it, and it reflects THE WAY GOD WISHES TO
BE KNOWN.
And as you will
discover, The Adamic image is the only Image in the universe
capable of reflecting MENTAL FORMS like Justice, goodness,
beauty, perfection etc. - Forms that cannot be encountered
anywhere in nature beyond the Adamic Element, yet it is the
image most wrongfully targeted and humiliated by the minds of
war who never stop creating weapons and diseases in reflection
of their Father's ancient arrogant refusal to bow down before
Adam and his ignorance of God's choice to subject his greatness
to the earthliness and modesty of The Adamic Image.
"They Appeared
in Human Images and Set the Net and the Knife to
Assassinate the Spirits of the Chosen..." (The Ancient Druze
Wisdom)
Not knowing who
the Sacred Limits are and what they stand for in every day and
age, according to the Ancient Wisdom, is like roaming around The
Creator's kingdom arbitrarily seeking some God which is not
knowledgeable and in a chaotic manner that do not appeal to the
MIND.
When thinking
Spirituality, most believe they can somehow bypass the Mind's
Logic into a jungle of dogmatic freedom that one can enter
without passing through any door or respecting any law or
order... It is as if The Creator is the Enemy of Logic or the
King of Magic, and as if the belief in God is a journey towards
everything which is Mind-Boggling or Inexplicable - a journey
that begins with following a behavioral code of conduct (a list
of religious dos and don'ts) and ends up somehow in experiencing
a supernatural ghostly existence in some unknown cloudy
dimension....
The Druze
Doctrines, granted the absurdity of such vision, free the Druze
Spirit from the pillars and rituals of religious behavior, and
rather, the doctrines emphasize a judicious look unto the sacred
texts of all religions which are inspired essentially by the
same GNOSTIC source - the Sacred Limits who are the messiahs of
all monotheistic thought.
The Sacred
Limits came in Greek times as philosophers, and in Ancient
Egyptian Times as Good Furrows, and in Judaic times as Jewish
Sages and Messiahs and in Christian times as Christ and His
close Circle of Followers and in Moslem times as Earthly Angels
that embraced and inspired the Islamic Dawa in its initial
stages.
A Druze is
encouraged to read all those sacred texts analytically (aided by
the guidance of the Ancient Druze Wisdom) in order to awaken
his/her inner sensitivity to authenticity.
Some religious
texts, according to the Druze Wisdom, have been somewhat
tampered with across history. Much has been added and much has
been deleted from those texts.
Thus, the Druze
Mind is encouraged to seek traces of The Sacred Thread of Wisdom
in all the holy texts and scriptures, especially the Ancient
Scriptures & Scrolls and most importantly The Ancient Greek
Philosophy which advocates a life of contemplation free from the
ties of religious behavior (customs and ceremonial rituals) and
even free from Fake Sufism that conceals a hidden form of
egoism. For, the Greeks were anything but Sufi; they understood
very well the importance of a life of balance between body and
soul and took very good care of their health and respected their
bodies...
They simply
cherished the choice of The Creator to place The Spirit (with
all its greatness) inside a body, eternally....
The Symbolic Fall From Eden & The Ancient Gnostic Order of
TRINITY:
THE
COGNITIVE FALL:
From
the Pythagorean Realm of Absolute
Consciousness - THE FORM ONE - THE FRAMELESS ONE
to
The
Platonic Realm of Conception
-
The
Platonic Forms (Form One disguised by the Numerical FRAME 1 that
constitutes
mental
activity)
to
The
Aristotlean
Realm
of Perception - The Aristotlean Forms (The Numerical 1 disguised
by the Physical
Frame
- The 3-Dimensional Extremities of Objects in Space
&
Time)
THE ABSOLUTE
EXISTENCE
of the
CREATOR (prior to His Creation) can be thought of as
the PART OF GOD WHICH IS BEYOND KNOWLEDGE - THE INEFFABLE SELF
OF GOD - OTHERWISE REFERRED TO IN THE ANCIENT DRUZE WISDOM AS
THE LAHOUTI SELF.
ABSOLUTE
EXISTENCE = ABSOLUTE ONENESS = EXISTENCE BEYOND FORM = EXISTENCE
BEYOND TRANSLATION = EXISTENCE BEYOND CONCEPTION,
Consequently =
EXISTENCE BEYOND
KNOWLEDGE
EXISTENCE,
irrelative to the nature of KNOWLEDGE = EXISTENCE THAT CANNOT BE
KNOWN TO EXIST
For Existence to
carry any relativity to knowledge, it must be subjected to the
DUALITY that rules the essential nature of KNOWLEDGE:
THE
KNOWER
THE OBJECT OF KNOWLEDGE
Accordingly,
such form of EXISTENCE should somehow reside in both, yet still
preserve its ABSOLUTE RESIDENCE IN THE CREATOR's LAHOUTI SELF
This is the
simple logic behind THE SACRED ORDER of TRINITY whom Blessed
Plotinus mentioned in his Enneads which is constituted of:
The ABSOLUTE
SELF OF THE CREATOR (THE LAHOUTI SELF)
The Creator's Knower Self: THE WHOLLY MIND - The 1st Knower
The Creator's Knowledgeable Self: THE NASOUTI IMAGE - The 1st
Object of Knowledge
Through the
Sacred Order of Trinity, the CREATOR preserves HIS
ABSOLUTENESS or IMMACULACY on top of the PYRAMID of TRINITY
on one hand,
yet on the other hand, fulfills His Wish to Be Known
through entering the RELATIVITY OF DUALITY which characterizes
the realm of knowledge and its dimensions.
This Duality is
represented by the two lower angles of the Pyramid of Trinity as
illustrated in the diagram above.
REMEMBER FOR NOW
THAT THE RELATIVE REALM OF KNOWLEDGE IS THE REALM OF
TRANSLATION, AND TRANSLATION IS IN ITS NATURE PRONE TO
DEFAULT & ERROR.
ALSO NOTE THAT
THE ORDER OF TRINITY RULES THE SPIRITUAL CREATION &
THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL FORM RULES THE PHYSICAL CREATION IN
COMPLETE RESEMBLANCE TO ONE ANOTHER...
THE TWO PYRAMIDS
THAT CONSTITUTE THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN AND THE KINGDOM
OF EARTH CONVERGE INSIDE THE SACRED ADAMIC NATURE WHERE
HEAVEN & EARTH INTERSECT...
The Duality
of Knowledge is the Most ancient form of duality, from which
springs forth all other famous dualities, like Spirit & Matter,
Interior & Exterior, Essence & Substance and of course not to
mentione the notoriously famous religious duality of Good & Evil
etc...
The WHOLLY MIND
(also known in the symbolic genesis account as ADAM) could be
compared to an EYE that emanates from the THE CREATOR's ORIGINAL
SELF that looks back at the CREATOR, and The Nasouti Image is a
Knowledgeable Image of the Creator that the Creator chooses to
appear in to this EYE.
As The Wholly
Mind reflects the Image of the Creator, the Wholly Mind is
Activated into being a MIND and KNOWLEDGE THUS ENTERS THE REALM
OF EXISTENCE...
God created the
Wholly Mind with a nature reflective of THE CREATIVE NATURE OF
GODHOOD, and thus the Wholly Mind is endowed with the ability to
TRANSLATE THE POWER TRANSMITTED TO HIM FROM THE CREATOR's
ORIGINAL SELF INTO A MEANINGFUL CREATIVE IMAGE...
THUS, REMEMBER
FOR NOW THAT THE WHOLLY MIND POSSESSES THE POWER TO TRANSLATE
THE FORMLESS INTO A FORM RELATIVE TO THE MIND'S NATURE... HE HAS
THE POWER TO TRANSLATE THE LIMITLESS ONE INTO A NUMERICAL 1..
LIKE THE SUN, HE
HAS THE POWER TO CAST ITS LIGHT UPON THE LIMITLESS DARK
SUBSTANCE THAT CONSTITUTES EXISTENCE MAKING IT RESONATE WITH
MEANINGFUL NUMERICAL IDENTITIES AND VIBRATE WITH COLOR, SHAPE &
FORM...
At the PURE
level of TRANSLATION (that characterizes the activity which
takes form within the 1st Order of Trinity), knowledge is
referred to as CONSCIOUSNESS:
Consciousness is symbolized by
the CIRCULAR FORM:
Which means:
knowledge at
this stage is so SELF-ENCIRCLED that The Knower and
The Object of Knowledge are both essentially ONE, in the
sense that The Knower never travels outside His Knower
Self in order to seek and arrive at the Object of
Knowledge.
The Knower
eternally rests within the Object and the Object rests within
the Knower. At this virgin state of knowledge, the Object
of Knowledge is such a pure translation of The Knower that
ONENESS is not an Object-of-Knowledge but rather a
State-of-Being, and the Wholly Mind is completely beyond any
form of awareness to the instrumental role he plays in the
Kingdom of Knowledge.
In other words,
Knowledge at this stage does not yet revolve around The Wholly
Mind's Self or Role but solely around The Creator's Self, and
The Wholly Mind (as The Knower) do not differentiate His Self
from the Creator's Self (The Object of knowledge) in any
sense... There is no numerical Frame-of-Identity that account
for any empty space in between The Knower & The Object of
Knowledge; they are both essentially a WHOLENESS that is
intolerant to any meaning of separation or departure which (as
you will doscover) is not the case in lower levels of knowledge
like perception.
At this level,
there is no POLAR TENSION between the TWO POLES OF KNOWLEDGE
that necessitate the emerging of any form of motion from the
concept of I towards the concept of The Other. The
Wholly Mind's Identity as a Knower does not come in between Him
and the Creator as would the Frame of a painting come in between
the painting and the perceiver (by constantly highlighting
awareness to the painting as a Directional object of
perception rather than a 360 Degree experience.
This level of
knowledge is
PYTHAGOREAN
and is referred to as Consciousness.
ENTER THE
PLATONIC
LEVEL OF
KNOWLEDGE (REALM OF FORMS) - The birth of the 2nd Order of
Trinity symbolized by th Birth of
EVA
from
ADAM's
rib:
The WHOLLY MIND,
made of the LIKING OF THE CREATOR, and REFLECTING THE LIMITLESS
FREE WILL OF THE CREATOR, is in a sense brought up to be a
Creator Himself.
As the WHOLLY
MIND REFLECTS THE IMAGE OF THE CREATOR in its most original
form, He reflects in turn the CREATOR'S REVOLUTIONARY WISH TO BE
KNOWN...As He reflects the image of ONENESS in its most virgin
form, he reflects in turn his own translation of that Image.
REMEMBER FOR NOW
THAT REFLECTION IS THE MOST ANCIENT ACT OF CREATIVITY, BECAUSE
IT IS THE MOST ANCIENT KNOWLEDGEABLE ACT OF CREATION AND IT
RESULTS IN CREATING DIMENSIONS TO THE OBJECT BEING REFLECTED
UPON...
In what is
depicted in the Ancient Druze Wisdom as A MOMENT OF BLINDNESS,
the Wholly Mind takes a glimpse at His own self, and for a
moment he realizes his own Identity in the Kingdom of Gnosis
& The Trinity of Knowledge.
He realizes the
Greatness of the Limitless Power granted to him by the Creator
over His Great Kingdom. This glimpse translates into a cognitive
transition of mode from Being a Conscious Knower in the
Trinity into A Behavioral Knower (Knowing that he is The
Knower in the Trinity).
This
automatically casts a part of The Knower outside of the
Trinity... For, at such moment, The Wholly Mind is no longer
fully involved in the Original context of the Trinity, but
rather part of Him rests preserving its place in the Original
Trinity and another part gets involved in a new trinity of its
own...
In this new
trinity the Object of Knowledge is no longer The Creator's Image
but rather The Wholly Mind's own Image - his powerful role
granted to him in the trinity...
Accordingly, THE
ABSOLUTE ONENESS (which rules the nature of consciousness)
immediately descends into another form of Oneness that fits in
this new dimension of knowledge: A Numerical Oneness.
Behold the
resemblance between the term dimension and the term
demented which is very telling of the nature of the course
that knowledge takes as it descends.
In this new
dimension, ONENESS becomes a Framed Object of
Knowledge rather than A Frameless Circle of Being,
and the Wholly Mind is for a second emitted
outside this circle - outside the Trinity of Consciousness
glancing at it trying to crystallize it within a numerical
mental frame of Oneness referred to as THOUGHT- ETERNAL.
This is the
essence of what is symbolically referred to in the Genesis
account as:
"Adam Being
cast outside heaven as a result of Taking a Bite from the
Poisonous Apple of Knowledge..."
In realizing his
own self-image, the Wholly Mind is for a moment distracted from
The Creator's Image; and ever since, distraction became an
attribute of the nature of this new dimension of Knowledge...
This new
dimension of knowledge (that is relative to the Wholly Mind's
new state of vision), as already mentioned, brings about the
birth of a new order of trinity:
From the Self of
the Wholly Mind, emanates an Eye (a Knower Self) directed back
at the Wholly Mind, but this time the Object of Knowledge (who
is The Wholly Mind and not The Creator) is transformed into a
Mental Image - a Mental Form of ONENESS that speaks the language
that this new Eye could understand; this mental Form is referred
to as THE THOUGHT OF THE ONE, and the Thought of the ONE
is the 1st numerical object to ever exist...
Consequently, Knowledge, which
in the 1st Order of Trinity took on the form of
consciousness,
falls automatically into a lower level in the new Order of
Trinity taking the form of
conception...
From here, it is not hard to comprehend why the
Activity of Thought
is
Gnostically associated with the Soul and not the Mind...
The birth of
this new Eye that springs forth from
ADAM
is
symbolically depicted in the Genesis account as The Birth
of Eve (Eva) from Adam's Rib. This Eye is referred to as
The Wholly Soul of ADAM (The Knower Self of Adam)...
At this level of
knowledge, ABSOLUTE ONENESS is framed by a Numerical 1 - a
Thought...
Numerical
Oneness, attempting to frame the Limitless ONENESS within it,
falls automatically into error, because the logic that rules
such tendency is impossible or rather absurd...
How could
The Limited possibly frame The Limitless?!!
Note that this
absurdity is exactly why the path of knowledge is theologically
associated with A FALL rather than An Ascension...
The numerical
factor behind such absurdity is the pure and simple logic behind
why
Pythagoras
considered the Universe as deceptively made out of
Number...
The Realm in which THE ONE
is disguised behind The Numerical Many is associated with The Platonic Realm of Forms or Ideas...
In the Platonic
Realm, The Knower utilizes the Deceptive Logic of
Numerical Possibility to preserve and separate his own
Identity from the identity of the Object of Knowledge.
Remember for now, that the image of Separation projected on this
level gives rise to the concept of Two-ness or Duality which is
the real origin of number....
Such image of separation
activates the mental activity of Conception
making it possible... i.e. It allows for the possibility to
frame conceptions numerically and thus account for Forms
Individually i.e. The Form Apple, The Form Tree, The Form White,
the Form Happiness etc...
In other words,
The Knower on this level is reduced into a numerical
entity in the equation (Number 1), and the Object of Knowledge
into another numerical entity: An OTHER (Number 2).
This Other takes
the form of a Number Two, and The Knower (who is
Number One) becomes aware of His Numerical Distinctiveness
from the Object of Knowledge via the Numerical Possibility
reflected by the activity of Thought or Conception...
So, no longer
wherever The Knower looks The Knower sees the Face of the ONE
(as is in the Trinity of Consciousness), but rather The Knower
now sees the Many Numerical faces of this Grand ONE...
Knowledge at
this level is no longer circular but directional, in the
sense that the Knower performs some level of polar traveling
outside his Numerical Circle of Selfhood and towards the
Numerical Selfhood of The Other (The Object of Knowledge).
Consequently,
ONENESS is no longer a State-of-Being-in-the-ONE but
rather a State-of-Seeing or Conceiving of the ONE, which
logically implies: being somewhere outside the One constantly
attempting to frame it through Thought.
On even much
lower levels of knowledge, it will become further clearer how
This Metaphysical Error becomes more and more like a growing
snow ball of deception that sustains its identity through
playing on the concept of TWO-NESS and SEPARATION, which in turn
gives birth to the concept of CONTRAST & OPPOSITION - The
Arithmetics of Conflict...
REMEMBER FOR NOW
THAT CONCEPTUAL IDENTITY IS THE OFFSPRING OF DUALITY &
DUALITY IS THE ORIGIN OF NUMBER. ABSOLUTE ONENESS IS BEYOND
IDENTITY AND THUS BEYOND NUMBER OR THE NUMERICAL 1.
The Mind at this
level is distracted by The Frame of One from BEING IN
THE ONE. It is distracted by the Frame-of-Sight from
BEING-IN-SIGHT itself. It is distracted by ACTING
like a mind from BEING a mind...
This form of
distraction supports the logic behind what is known as THE EGO.
It constitutes the most ancient erroneous temptation that rules
all other temptations in the lower system of dualities, the most
serious of which is the theological system of Good & Evil.
This erroneous
temptation is so deeply spiritual and metaphysical in nature
that the behavioral system of Good and Evil will sound like a
joke in comparison to it.
ALSO Remember
for now that Good and Evil is so deeply a
State-of-Mind prior to being anything resembling a
Code-of-Conduct...
And to seek
sight of what is beyond the CIRCLE OF SELFHOOD that
characterizes CONSCIOUSNESS, is the most ancient form of
Eve-illness that the Mind metaphysically falls into prior to any
physical engagement in a behavioral misconduct.
As a result,
More Means Less, and THE MORE YOU TEND TO TRANSLATE
YOUR STATE-OF-BEING NUMERICALLY (as in sequential causality
1 causes 1 causes 1 causes 1 etc...), THE MORE YOU ARE
FORCED TO DEPART AWAY FROM BEING INSIDE THE EYE OF THE MEANING
TRANSLATED AND RATHER FORCED TO BE A BLIND SERVANT IN THE
TRANSLATION...
THIS IS JUST THE
NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE & TRANSLATION...AND IN ORDER TO RETURN TO
THE SIMPLICITY OF YOUR ANCIENT HOME INSIDE THE KINGDOM OF THE
FATHER - INSIDE HIS VISION, YOU MUST REGAIN THE INNOCENCE OF
YOUR ANCIENT CHILDHOOD IN THE EDEN OF THE TRINITY OF
CONSCIOUSNESS-
"You shall not
enter the Kingdom of thy Father, lest you return like
children..."
(The Words of
Christ)
THEREBY, YOU
MUST UNDERSTAND THAT KNOWLEDGE AS YOU KNOW IT TO BE COULD BE A
DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD. IT COULD BE A MEANS TO RETURN HOME TO
SIMPLICITY OF THE ONE OR A MEANS TO DEPART AWAY INTO THE
INFINITE COMPLEXITY OF NUMBER AND NUMERICAL COGNITION,
AND,
IN ORDER TO
COMPREHEND WHERE KNOWLEDGE ENDS AND CONSCIOUSNESS BEGINS YOU
MUST UNDERSTAND HOW IT ALL STARTED...
Note that that
EVIL is an EVE-related-ILLNESS... Eve (or the Soul) and not the
Mind is Gnostically associated with the Thinking Agency,
where error takes its most original form - the form of a number
- a thought...
Eve (in Arabic)
is referred to as HAWWAA.
Hawwaa comes
from the Arabic term IHTAWA which means To Contain.
The MIND, in
Eve's Realm (The Trinity of Conception), falls into being a
Container of Number - A Container of Numerical
Entities called Thoughts after once being The Creator
Himself (in The Trinity of Consciousness)...
Remember that A
THOUGHT is what originally separates the Wholly Mind from the
Creator, AND YOUR OWN THOUGHTS ARE THE VEIL OF IGNORANCE THAT
SEPARATE YOU FROM THE CIRCLE OF CONSCIOUSNESS WITHIN
It is also important to
understand that Thought is not characteristic of the Wholly
Mind's activity but the Soul.
Accordingly, to
the Gnostic discernment, the Soul and not the MIND is the
conceptual faculty.
The MIND's
original activity is CONSCIOUSNESS, and the Mind is more
accurately defined as being THE SPIRIT. The Spirit is a form of
ONENESS that is beyond the numerical limitations or
particularity. It resides in everything everywhere
SIMULTANEOUSLY.
The Nature of
Error thus is confined and Contained within Eve's
Realm The Wholly Soul. This is why Eve or The Wholly Soul is
referred to in the Druze Wisdom as
The Martyr of All Martyrs,
who had to enact in Space & Time the meaning of
sacrifice (in service of Gnosis and translation).
Eve (else known
Gnostically as Sophia), in everyday and age, reflects the
meaning of repentance by sacrificing her Image for the sake of
dissolving back in her higher origin The Mind. He is
John the Baptist
whose head
was severed in the Christian Times for the sake of Christ, and:
all the words in
the world fall short of expressing the significance of John and
what His sacred life and path reflected in terms of revealing
the Hidden Path of the Soul
This is why the
Soul's Repentance is historically associated with BLOOD &
SACRIFICE.
For, the PATH of
repentance is the path of EVE giving up her own world, her own
story, her own self and re-entering ADAM and disappearing inside
HIM in order to be part of HIS consciousness again and reclaim
her natural place inside the Father's Trinity.
In doing so, EVE
would be like giving herself back to Adam which is what
Martyrdom metaphysically means in The-Truth-in-Finality.
Eve is also
compared in the Druze wisdom to the MOON that ultimately
disappears in the presence of the SUN after deceptively playing
the SUN's role throughout the darkness.
Darkness
in this analogy symbolizes the Wholly Mind's deceptive absence
at that Blind Moment which gives Eve (His Soul) a margin to play
with making up her own diverted version of creation...
The Wholly Mind
(ADAM) hence preserves HIS neutrality to the POLAR nature of
Knowledge and is not lessened along the falling process of
creation in the same way as the Sun is not in any way emptied or
lessened by the overflow of light that emanates from it.
The Wholly
Mind's place in the CIRCLE OF THE 1st ORDER OF TRINITY is
preserved for him by the Father. However, THE WISDOM OF THE
FATHER mandates that consciousness descend into lower more
humble levels in order resemble The Creator's original Choice to
descend into the humble level of KNOWLEDGE.
The Kingdom must
be LOST & then REGAINED in order to be known to be present in
the 1st place - THIS KNOWLEDGE IS THE ESSENCE OF WHAT ETERNAL
HAPPINESS MEANS...
"Oh Thy Secured
Soul return to thy Father's Kingdom Happy and Content and enter
His Heaven Once More..."
(From the Holy Book of Qura'an)
The
manifestation of the Wholly Mind as an En-Souled Person in Space
& Time, walking the face of this earth, and the manifestation of
His Soul (EVE) as another en-souled person (a number 2 of Adam
occupying its own numerical space on earth) is in complete
accordance and submission to the Law of Knowledge which mandates
that DUALITY & SEPARATION (HOWEVER DECEPTIVE) IS IN ITS FINALITY
SHALL BE IN COMPLETE SERVICE OF THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE. For,
without the knowledgeable stories between those men and their
deeds on earth, how else would we learn about the greatness of
such Unity...
In their earthly
presence and actions as two separate persons in space & time,
the spiritual kingdom becomes earthly in nature, conveniently in
service of knowledge even at its most lower levels:
Like light that
stretches out to reach even the darkest corners of the earth,
The Creator never forsake even his most ignorant among his
creatures. He sendeth forth Christ and his Spouse-Eternal
Eva as real humans for every EYE to SEE and every EAR to HEAR...
This point will
make itself more clear as we introduce the sacred STORY OF ADAM
, ENOCH & SETH. You will discover then how ADAMIC ACTIONS ON
EARTH, that may have occurred thousands of light years ago, are
meant to reflect an ETERNAL SPIRITUAL NATURE ALIVE INSIDE EACH
ONE OF US EVEN NOW AS WE SPEAK...
ENTER THE
ARISTOTLEAN REALM
- The 3rd Order of Trinity - Enter
The 3-Dimensional Forms
Numerical
Identities Translated into Extremities of Objects in Space &
Time = Platonic Forms exposed to Statistical Particularity -
Mental Images exposed to the Molding
Wax
of Material Substance
As
Eve
herself in turn glances at her own beauty, she misses sight of
the Wholly Mind,
Adam.
An Eye emanates from her looking back at her, translating her
numerical presence from a Thought inside Adam's Mind into an
actual numerical person in space and time with its numerical
self translated this time to 3-Dimensional form;
And as she looks
back searching for the Wholly Mind she sees him this time as a
numerical-other-in-person.
Consequently,
knowledge falls one step lower from the level of
Conception
down to the level of
Perception.
At this level.
ONENESS which is disguised by Number 1 grows yet even more
disguised... Number 1 becomes in itself disguised behind a new
translation - a spacio-temporal form called the Physical
Extremities...
The knower in
this 3rd Order of Trinity is known as
The Wholly Word,
and the Third Object of Knowledge is known as the Perceptual
Realm of Space & Time. The Wholly Word, who is referred to
in the Druze Wisdom as the WAX OF IMAGERY is the LINK
between The Spiritual Kingdom and the Earthly Kingdom.
He represents
the Mold through which Platonic Forms are imprinted upon (the
wax of space and time) and through which numerical oneness is
translated into a physical extremity that possess statistical
particularity.
The person of
the Wholly word is known as THE GREAT SETH in the
ancient times...
In the 2nd
Treatise of The Great Seth, Seth lights upon his own nature
and what it represents in the Kingdom of Knowledge by
depicting his enemies as:
Disturbed Souls
attempting to kill him not knowing that he is the power that
provides death its form & meaning...
At this point, I will go through
a brief explanation of the The 3rd Order of Trinity and
leave other details for later. For, as I advance into
introducing Plato's Theory of Forms (from the Gnostic
Perspective) and later the mathematics of The Unique Fifth
Science, it will become self-explanatory how knowledge falls
from The 2nd Order of Trinity
down one level unto to
The 3rd
i.e. how Conception falls into Perception and how Numerical
Forms (else known as Ideas or Platonic Forms) are translated
into 3-dimensional objects in space & time, in service of
yet another fallen (yet sacred) level of knowledge known
as The Aritotlean Realm.
Aristotle
is
known in the Ancient Druze Wisdom as the Person of The
Wholly Word (The 3rd Limit). He is represented by the Yellow
color in the Five-Colored Druze Flag... Aristotle is
historically known as a philosopher who somehow critiqued the
Idealism that Plato exhibited in his Theory of Forms,
through bringing down Plato's Forms from the heavenly level of
Eternity to the earthly level of Space & Time.
In brief, Plato
associated the nature of the Form with a mental concept or idea
and Aristotle associated the nature of the Form with an
actual 3-dimensional object that the eye seems to encounter
empirically in space & time, bringing it down from the
Absoluteness that Plato endowed it with.
However,
Aristotle also emphasized that mental conceptions or Forms
become at their best what they are once they are
acknowledged by the Perceiver for what they are.
In other words,
an Apple is at its best state an Apple when its
being acknowledged for being an apple by the perceiver's eye...
Hence, Aristotle
did not fully admit to the Empirical Logic in the sense
that objects exist out there independently of the Subjectivity
of the Perceiver.
This is somewhat
of a complex notion that will become clearer as we go along.
Please, do not let the weight of the philosophical body of
terminology scare you away from capturing the spirit of the
material which could not be simplified any further due to its
dense nature by default.
For now, it is
enough to note that Aristotle's Conception of Form is
ignorantly mistaken in history as being some form of a critique
or contradiction to Plato's; and unfortunately, much has been
built around this notion to the extent that traditional
commentaries on those two men depicts them as philosophical
rivals, almost as though each coming from a different planet of
philosophy or school of thought...
As you will
discover, according to the Gnostic records, this is utter
ignorance. You will discover that the two men are far more than
mere philosophers and certainly they are no ordinary minds...
You will discover how the
Aristotlean
attempt to further translate and
Crystallize
Plato's
Forms, did not enter the records of
history save for the purpose of revealing the deceptive nature
of Translation itself, and it came in complete harmony with
Aristotle's Spiritual position in the 3rd Order of Trinity and
in complete accordance with the logical course of development
that knowledge takes as it falls from the
Trinity of Conception
and into the
Trinity of Perception.
As already
explained, the course of Translation, however fallen or
erroneous, is in its final nature tied and limited to WHAT
TRANSLATION IS AND WHAT IT IS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED TO SERVE...
Thus, despite
the deceptive facets of translation, it remains in its finality
in harmony with The Creator's Original plan.
It is almost as
if the Creator intended for The Wholly Mind to fall into the
Mathematics of that Blind Moment and emerge back from it; as if
he intended to reveal the nature of error, knowing that error
serves a Gnostic Cause, and once this cause is revealed
error becomes self-destructive and is automatically stripped out
of its power and mystery...
For, although
translation, as it progresses, becomes more and more prone to
the mathematics of error, such progression is the only agency
that would ultimately translate the nature of The Act of
Translation itself and reveals the absurdity of its
deceptive nature.
This form of
revelation ultimately strips error from its magic and its
spiritual threat and its ghost-like mystery, bringing it back to
the confinements of its own limitations. Its brings it to its
own death after it had served the law and the Gnostic cause...
It brings back the Deceptive Rebellious Logic that sprung forth
from THE NATURE OF TRANSLATION into COMPLETE OBEDIENCE and
HARMONY with the Creator's Original WISH for the UNKNOWN TO BE
KNOWN and THE LIMITLESS TO HAVE LIMITS and the MYSTERIOUS TO
BECOME LUCID CLEAR AND PRONOUNCED.
Blessed Christ
himself (The Person of the Wholly Mind during the
Judaic-Christian times), although reflected the divine greatness
of THE CREATOR's IMAGE, and despite the grand position granted
to Him by the Creator in HIS KINGDOM, through His earthly Adamic
presence and appearance, himself entered the realm of
translation in order to reveal God's Gnostic Wisdom and Choice.
Jesus walked on
earth bare foot at times and spoke the humble Adamic language
that is friendly to human perception.
HE PERFORMED
VISIBLE MIRACLES FOR THE ORDINARY EYE TO SEE AND SPOKE OF
PARABLES FOR THE ORDINARY EAR TO HEAR AND WALKED THE HUMBLE PATH
OF REPENTANCE AS ANY EN-SOULED ADAMIC, ALL FOR THE SAKE OF
MANIFESTING IN THE KNOWLEDGEABLE FORM (EVEN TO THE MOST IGNORANT
AMONG MEN) THE HUMBLE WISH OF THE CREATOR TO BE KNOWN BY HIS
CREATION AND HIS WILLINGNESS TO STEP DOWN FROM HIS THRONE OF
MYSTERY AS THE CREATOR AND ENTER HIS OWN CREATION AND BE KNOWN
BY HIS CREATURES AND LIVE WITH THEM AND APPEAR TO THEM IN THEIR
IMAGE AND BE PART OF EVEN THEIR DARKEST THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS AND
GIVE THEM HOPE IN THEIR MOST HELPLESS MOMENTS - DESTROYING ALL
THE GRAND ROLES AND GREAT IDENTITIES THAT COME ON THE EXPENSE OF
BEING SIMPLY AND MODESTLY ADAMIC...
The following
diagram illustrates the Sacred Kingdom of Trinities, and the
fall of knowledge FROM CONSCIOUSNESS TO CONCEPTION TO
PERCEPTION...
THE STORY of
Adam,
Enoch
&
Seth
&
THE ANALOGY of
The Sun,
The Moon
&
The Light
Can Adamics
escape its Context?
There is an
ancient story in the Sacred Druze Manuscripts that revolves
around the three members that constitute the Kingdom of Heaven
among The Sacred Order of Five:
The Wholly Mind,
The Wholly Soul & The Wholly Word, whose persons back then were
Adam, Enoch & Seth.
Briefly:
In the alleged
story, Adam is said to have been granted by God The Power of
Leadership and Enoch was Adam's Subordinate
and Seth Adam's Messenger.
One time, during
Adam's absence, El-Habbal (an ancient theological term for the
devil) seduced Enoch to assume Adam's position in His absence,
claiming that Adam is gone forever and would wish for this to
happen...
Seth, being
Adam's Messenger, is said to have been influenced by the
devil to go along with the plan and help sway Enoch to subdue to
it. And so they both went along...
Eventually, Adam
is said to have emerged back home from his absence, and both,
Enoch & Seth woke up to discover themselves in the Wrong Time
at the Wrong Place doing the Wrong Act;
and
consequently, they fell into the torturous deep pain involved
with The Mathematics of the Original Sin...
Accordingly,
Enoch was referred to as The Disobedient Adam
and Seth as The Forgetful Adam...
The events of
this story which took place in the Cradle of Time, are
said to have been so Powerful and Meaningful that
no Adamic Soul on earth could ever escape the power and span of
its meaning, even up till now as we speak...
In short, this
story, the events of which took place in space & time among
those three men (who represent a spiritual triangle inside each
one of us), decoded a very ancient spiritual tendency deeply
engraved within each Adamic soul - a tendency for being
disobedient and forgetful - a tendency based on which is
determined the eternal destiny of the soul.
Adam's conscious
voice within is never really absent. However, one may choose
willingly to ignore it, and such choice that initiates on a
subtle metaphysical level may develop unto severely behavioral
levels to the extent that The Disobedient and
Forgetful Adams within us could end up taking full charge of
our spiritual destiny, reaching with the soul unto grounds of no
return and where any form of repentance would simply imply
Spiritual Ironing (a term used to describe the fires of
spiritual death).
This process is
initiated by the soul cognitively switching its mode from its
original position as a Conscious Receiver of the Mind
Power and into a Behavioral Actor driven by the most
ancient spiritual tendency to assume the role of THE SAVIOR on
the expense of living the true mathematics of salvation...
Remember,
Christ The Savior Himself (Who is the person of the Wholly
Mind known in this story as Adam) is not THE SAVIOR in the sense
that HE saves humanity through playing The Savior Role.
Christ is the Savior in the sense that HE remains HIMSELF
faithful to the Meaning of Salvation, by constantly allowing HIS
self to be a pure mirror reflection of the IMAGE OF THE FATHER.
Christ is thus
completely immune against the TENDENCY TO BE CHRIST and TO ACT
LIKE CHRIST THE SAVIOR...
Inside each
Adamic who has ever walked upon the face of this earth encoded
is the mathematics that binds the Sacred Adamic Trinity,
ADAM, ENOCH & SETH; and their story is decoded in our
life events and choices.
No Adamic could
possibly escape the fateful power of his/her soul's innermost
spiritual stance towards The Wholly Mind: ADAM.
The natural
position of the Obedient Soul The Eve or Enoch Within
is to be like a
Moon
in relation to the
Sun
- a passive receptor & reflector to the
Light
of the Wholly Mind.
However, the
birth of Eve, as revealed in the 2nd Order of Trinity,
came hand in hand with the birth of error. Again, this is not to
say that Eve's birth is in itself an error or a sin (as it is
religiously and historically depicted), but rather that THE
CONCEPT OF SIN OR ERROR in itself is relative to a BEHAVIORAL
TENDENCY that is specific to Eve's language and determined by
her final stance towards ADAM, and measured by how far The she
diverts from him.
In as much as
the Soul diverts from the Mind, the soul grows less and less
conscious of her actions and more and more behavioral - more
prone to misusing the Power of the Word to its own selfish
advantage - to fabricate her own little stories on the expense
of Adam's Great Story. This is what is meant by The Dark side
of the Soul (The Psyche), and it is also what is meant by
The Dark Night of the Soul...
During this Dark
Night, which symbolizes the Mind's Deceptive Absence, the Soul
is put to the ultimate test. of time... Will it be able to
master the Language of the Dawn... In order to do so, she
will have to give herself up like a shining moon surrendering to
the first rays of light as the dawn approaches...
When the Wholly
Mind glanced at HIS own image for a moment, He missed sight of
the Creator's Image. This moment could be compared to a day
dream in which the Wholly Mind envisioned Himself in a Story of
His own, in a world where there is no Salvation but rather A
Savior - for the only true Savior is The Creator.
This world,
however dreamy, is dark and devoid of the mathematics of
salvation; and in it, the soul of Adam is left alone in
alienation with her endless thoughts and limitless numerical
possibilities - left to face her fate on her own...
The part of The
Wholly Mind that contained and accounted for this Dreamy Eye
is Eve (Hawaa The Container), and thus the whole Dream
Dimension pertains to Eve's.
Like a dream in
comparison to a waking state, Eve's Realm is to that which
belongs to ADAM.
As a result,
The Wholly Soul or EVE (who is the DREAM SELF OF ADAM), is
prone to mistakenly see HERSELF AT TIMES AS THE ADAM OF HER OWN
STORY AND IS THUS PRONE TO ACT ON HER OWN, TURNING A DEAF EAR TO
ADAM'S VOICE.
She is prone to
misunderstand ADAM and as a result reflect an Image of a
DISOBEDIENT ADAM who assumes the Role of The Savior on
the expense of True Salvation.
Like a Moon
shining in the darkness of the night (the sun's illusive
absence), Eve wishes to appear and play the role of Adam in His
absence.
In the Sun's
absence, darkness provides the Moon with a temporary atmosphere
(a moment of fame) in which it can deceptively appear like the
Sun - like The Shining Star ; even though in the final
reality, the shiny appearance of the Moon in the darkness is not
an inherent part of the moon's nature itself; for the Moon is
but a cold dark planet.
Darkness, which
derives its identity from the Sun's illusive absence, is
symbolic of the Seductive Power of Evil which drove Enoch to
assume Adam's position in His Absence. Evil has no role to play
in the full presence of Adam...
The shiny
appearance of the moon at night is merely a deceptive reflection
transmitted to the moon from the Sun.
EVE, in the same
way as the Moon plays on the appearance of the Sun's image in
his own image, plays on the deceptive aspects brought about by
Adam's temporary absence which allows for Adam's image to
reflect upon hers.
Darkness
provides a fertile ground for the Moon to imitate the SUN.
The state of the
Sun's full presence during daylight symbolizes
THE-TRUTH-IN-FINALITY, where the SOUL ultimately faces the MIND
IN THE FULL PRESENCE OF THE FATHER, either prepared or
unprepared.
On the wake of
such confrontation, like the moon disappearing in daylight, all
images and identities fall in the presence of such ONENESS, and
the SOUL is undressed and exposed through the MIRROR (THE MIND)
to its TRUTH-IN-FINALITY, either Prepared or Unprepared. In this
original context, the Savior Role no longer exists and light is
no longer diffused but overwhelmingly overflowing - and
BLINDING....
In the Sun's
full presence, the context of darkness is exposed for being
merely a delusive effect caused by Light itself, and the Moon is
forced to give up its illusively Shiny Identity completely...
The SUNRISE
symbolizes the return of Adam from His Illusive absence, at
which point the Deceptive Logic of Seduction is exposed
for what it is and darkness disappears leaving the moon the
wrong and causing its image to loose its allure and shiny
appearance.
The Moon's Shiny
Form or Silhouette that the light vs. darkness contrast
permeates into vision, is symbolic of The Wholly Word
role or (SETH who is Adam's Messenger in the story). Like a
messenger, The Moon's Shiny Form is indirectly sent by the sun,
and sunlight is really what provides objects with their
perceptibility or visual extremities.
However, during
the night, The Power of Form serves as a double-edged
sward, it either serves as a tool of knowledge and enlightenment
or as a tool of Ego.
As a tool of
Ego, it utilizes the Sunlight to conspire against the SUN itself
by serving to help the Moon assume the Sun's Role...
This is symbolic
of the role SETH plays in the story as The Forgetful Adam, who,
although is Adam's Messenger, yet he is influenced by The Devil
to conspire against Adam in his absence using the Power of
Word for the wrong reasons - to convince Enoch to
subdue to the Devil's plan.
Later, it will
become clear how the polarity between relative light and
darkness which gives rise to the Moon's Deceptive Image at night
is symbolic of an illusive
System of
Behavioral Good & Evil
- a system that religious institutions would forcefully endorse
across the centuries and that would come to dominate over the
Ancient Gnostic System of Absolute Goodness
which is like
Existence or Consciousness - completely intolerant to any form
of contrast or opposition - an intolerance that ultimately
renders evil's identity in its logic-of-context SIMPLY
NONEXISTENT.
The system of
behavioral Good & EVIL, like a dream that takes over reality, it
becomes more of a actuality to the Soul in as much as the SOUL
departs from The Gnostic Truth of Adam ( which is Consciousness
or Knowledge of the Absolute Good).
In the Full
Presence of such knowledge, there is NO EVE-ILLNESS - NO EVIL.
According to the Truth-in-Finality, evil is a state of
Eve-related-Illness measured by how far the Soul departs from it
conscious Origin inside ADAM where she has perfect view and
sight of THE FATHER.
As the SOUL
overlook this truth across time, the Soul gradually falls victim
to FORGETFULNESS, which translates itself in THE SOUL FALLING
VICTIM TO THE CONTEXT OF THE BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM OF GOOD & EVIL,
where evil is substantiated into a Form of Judgment that
the Soul expects to receive for her Bad Behavior.
In other words,
the notion of Good (at such fallen level) looses any relativity
to The Gnostic Cause (which is knowledge) and becomes measured
by A Code of Conduct referred to as Religious Behavior...
By such
standards, The Ultimate Evil becomes THE RELIGIOUS FEAR OF
PUNISHMENT BASED UPON BEHAVIOR.
Eventually, the
Soul's entrapment inside this behavioral system nourishes her
judgmental behavior, ultimately forcing the soul to inflict upon
her self THE RELIGIOUS CONTEXT OF ETERNAL JUDGMENT which is
basically = LOOSING HOPE IN THE FATHER's MERCY OR IN THE
SIGNIFICANT ROLE THAT KNOWLEDGE PLAYS IN THE MATHEMATICS OF
SALVATION.
In the Gnostic
Reality, Loosing Hope in the Father's Mercy is really the state
of failing to see The Father's Wisdom in events . Loosing Hope
in the Father's Mercy is in Reality THE ETERNAL SIN in itself
and not the Eternal Judgment, because it is nothing but the
final chapter in the Soul's attempt to play The Savior Role on
the expense of its own salvation - a chapter which depicts the
Soul playing the role of The Merciless God of Her Own
Destiny...
This is
irredeemable behavior, not in the sense that the SOUL DESERVES
TO BE ETERNALLY PUNISHED FOR SUCH BEHAVIOR, but in terms of what
it translates in The Gnostic Truth-in-Finality:
SPIRITUAL
SUICIDE.
In other words,
there is simply no logic that the Soul could seek or reach which
can ultimately justify or redeem its own Self-Destructive
behavior...
The tendency to
play the Savior Role on the expense of true salvation is
a very ancient spiritual tendency that Christ himself warned
against...
When a crowd
looked at Him in Person and referred to Him as GOD, He expressed
his wish that the ground open and swallow Him along with that
crowd, because He knew that those people were not seeing the
Light of the Father in Him; instead they were trapped within the
context of the POWER OF THE SAVIOR ROLE THAT THE FATHER GRANTED
TO HIM...
In the ancient
Druze Wisdom, The Wholly Mind is quoted saying:
"He who knows
the difference between Me and My Image shall be saved of the
Dangerous illnesses from which is caused The Eternal Death..."
Eternal Life and
Death for the Souls means the difference between Being trapped
ETERNALLY in the IMAGE of THE SAVIOR or understanding the
difference between this Image and the Light of SALVATION
transmitted through it from THE FATHER.
Only through
such understanding can the DEADLY IMAGE be penetrated and the
soul could rest BEING INSIDE THE EYE OF THE SAVIOR AT-ONE
with THE FATHER - inside the PROMISED NEW JERUSALEM, The
Jerusalem of the Heart, which is symbolic of THE CIRCLE OF
CONSCIOUSNESS depicted in the 1st Order of Trinity - the
only place where CHRISTHOOD (AS AN IMAGE) has no significance
what so ever, because The Knower and The Knowledgeable
and Knowledge itself all become ONE...
The Savior
tendency is a spiritual illness, and the soul that falls into
such tendency is referred to by Plato as Psyche and not
SOUL. The term SOUL was originally used in reference to The
Obedient Soul who preserves her place inside ADAM and
remains conscious of her identity in the Father's Reality.
On the other
hand, The Disobedient Soul, otherwise referred to as
Psyche, is severed from her original place inside Adam by her
own behavioral tendency to play Adam's role in her own
dream-like little stories; and being severed from Adam means
being cast outside the Father's Vision & Plan,
"Through you I
Punish and through you I reward..." (The Ancient Druze Wisdom)
.
This is why
Hermes Trismegistus (Blessed be his name), in his Tablets, spoke
of the Soul's ability to endure and withstand facing The Father
Without Shaking, and considered The Blessed
Soul is the Soul that remains alive inside the Father's
Vision and follows the path of repentance (that Enoch and Seth
walked).
When a student of Hermes once
questioned the Gnostic doctrine that divided humanity into two(The
Children of Light and
The Children
of Darkness)
and asked Hermes about the difference between Souls that
are ultimately destined to be saved and Souls that are not,
especially that both souls seem to suffer on earth equally,
Hermes replied that the difference is so little and yet so
great:
Salvaged Souls,
said Hermes, are aware of the Mathematics of Evil in
its Finality, and realize just in time the meaning of what
they are going through and how evil indirectly serves the
Absolute Good, and is far from being on a real competitiveness
with such good. this prevents them from being chocked and
disturbed by the dark context of events - it prevents them from
seeing evil or falling into its blind context...
while on the
other hand, Miserable Souls, added Hermes, are too caught inside
the context of behavioral good & evil to realize how it
ultimately fits in The Father's Plan; and this ultimately causes
them to be eternally chocked and disturbed by the darkness of
events and accordingly they cast themselves by themselves
out of the Plan...
A Brief Recount:
It is by now
clear that the Conscious IDENTITY of the SOUL translates into
the Soul being a Passive Receptor or LISTENER to the
Wholly MIND's VOICE.
Like the moon in
the full presence of the sun is the state of the obedient soul
that undresses herself from all her fake appearances and
identities that are only made to fit inside the The Dark Context
which assumes a rebellious self-destructive reality - The
Devil's Vision.
Being in the
conscious receptive mode allows the Soul to listen to the
Wholly Mind's voice and receive and preserve her Conscious
Identity inside The Father's Vision . It allows her to
experience the meaning that encircle her actions in Space
& Time and how it fits in the matrix of
The-Truth-in-Finality.
As for the
Soul's ill tendency to assume the Mind's Position, it
automatically switches the Soul's mode from The Conscious
Receptive Mode and to The Blind Behavioral Mode.
The Soul's
behavioral identities are short-lived segmented roles that the
Soul plays inside her own egoistic dream-like visions in which
the soul travels outside her self to envision Images of Herself
in dream-like situations that frame her as The Hero of
those stories.
This impels the
Soul to assume the position of the Behavioral Actor
rather than the Conscious Witness or Listener, and her
own Behavioral Actions create a VEIL of DISTRACTION similar to
NOISE that prevents her from listening to the Mind's voice
within and ultimately severs her from her Conscious Adamic
Origins - transferring her into a PSYCHE.
This is the
essence of what is meant by Karmic Entanglements, where
the Souls is trapped within a chain of action ruled by numerical
causality - so controlled by the strong currents of Cause and
Effect that it could no longer return to her secure and
innocent childhood.
And as Christ
says:
"You shall not
enter the Kingdom of Heaven lest you return like Children..."
However, the
MIND's Law is not a choice for the soul to accept or
reject, but rather an Eternal Truth that justifies the soul's
existence to begin with. Thus, tt remains the very element
within that is responsible for the Psyche's Eternal
Psychological Suffering, even though it is also the very
element responsible for the Soul's Eternal Happiness.
The MIND is a
two-edged sword. For, while the Soul could turn a deaf ear to
the His Voice by busying herself in Night Stories and
traveling in her own dream-like experiences, she cannot possibly
rule out the Logic of Sunrise or Awakening.
However, waking
up may come too late....
The Psyche, like
an eye that is exposed to SUNRISE after extreme darkness, if
suddenly exposed to the Mind's Overwhelming Logic unprepared,
could loose her vision forever - an exposure that threatens to
burn even her possibility to dream... After all, dreams revolve
around daylight impressions... This process is described in the
Druze wisdom as:
"The Soul being Ironed
to brought to a meltdown..."
The build up of
The Fear of being awakened from her dreams across
time ultimately causes the Psyche to develop FEAR OF THE MIND -
FEAR OF LIGHT - Fear of the Father Figure and further envision
the ending of her identities in her own stories with no mental
limits to stop her...
Again, this is
the state of the ill soul who PLAYS THE ROLE OF THE GOD OF HER
OWN DESTINY BY INFLICTING ETERNAL JUDGMENT UPON HER SELF NOT
KNOWING THAT SUCH BEHAVIOR ITSELF TRANSLATES THE MEANING OF
ETERNAL SIN = SPIRITUAL SUICIDE...
TO UNDERSTAND
THIS CONCEPT... THINK OF THE NOTION OF ALIENATION... ALIENATION
IS THE CENTER CAUSE BEHIND ANY CASE OF SUICIDE ... SPIRITUAL
ALIENATION IS THE ORIGIN OF ALL FORMS OF ALIENATION, AND IT
BEGINS WITH THE SOUL'S BEHAVIORAL DEPARTURE FROM HER CONSCIOUS
HOME.
THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN THE SOUL & THE MIND (ADAM & EVE WITHIN) IS THE CENTER
AROUND WHICH THE EVENTS OF OUR LIFE-STORIES WITH ALL THEIR
DETAILS ULTIMATELY REVOLVE...
THUS, THE
ETERNAL QUESTION IS: IS YOUR ENOCH AND YOUR SETH AT PEACE WITH
YOUR ADAM?
A
SOBER MOMENT IN HISTORY
THE
SACRED LINK BETWEEN THE
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN & THE KINGDOM OF EARTH
Since time
eternal, EXISTENCE has been mysteriously divided by dualities:
Eternity vs.
Space and Time,
Spirit vs. Matter,
Soul vs. Body,
The Interior Realm vs. The Exterior Realm,
The Mental vs. The Physical ,
THE CONSCIOUS vs. THE BEHAVIORAL etc....
In the Far
Easter Religions, the duality of EXISTENCE is symbolized by the
Ying/Yang illustration...
In Judaism, it
is symbolized by the converging triangles...
In Christianity
by the converging lines of the cross...
In the Famous
Davinci painting by the two hands almost touching...
ETC.....
Unfortunately,
since the dawn of the monotheistic journey, consciousness of the
Ancient Gnostic Duality of The Knower vs. The Object
of Knowledge, became dormant in the hidden chambers of the
MIND; and instead, lower forms of duality forced their way the
most famous of which is:
THE DUALITY OF
GOOD vs. EVIL
The duality of
Good & Evil is usually highlighted by a Religious System of
DO'S & DON'TS.
In short, it is
ruled by a BEHAVIORAL CODE OF CONDUCT and enforced in the name
of God and SPIRITUALITY,
Ironically this
system has managed to serve the political agendas of world
tyrants across history more than serving spiritual or cognitive
well-being, so much so that Religion and Politics, by virtue of
behavioral standards, could be considered two sides of the same
coin:
Political
institutions punish rebellious people for their bad behavior in
the name of the LAW,
and Religious institutions achieve what the LAW cannot achieve
in the name of GOD & Good vs. Evil.
Humanity was so
absorbed by the polarity between those two seemingly contrasting
institutions The Secular vs. The Religious and so tossed
and turned in between that humans hardly had any chance to
contemplate the deceptive elements of such polarity and its
damaging outcomes on all levels ...
History itself
could be generally viewed as one great tragic story that
revolves around the Polarities between such forms of Behavioral
Systems of Dualities .
Historical
cataclysms that tragically ended historical cycles like those of
Atlantis & Lemuria are major earthly events driven by a the
similar polarity of that between Spirit vs. Matter which
generated IGNORANCE on a major scale.
In the dawn of
the Atlantean civilization for instance, there were no religions
in the form known to man in this cycle. In that childhood period
of humanity's age, there existed a unique balance between Spirit
and Matter protected by spiritual innocence.
Accordingly,
humanity behaved consciously, neither spiritually nor
materially, and thus experienced Edenic times in the early
Atlentean eons.
We've already
mentioned how millions of years ago, humans possessed great
spiritual powers that are nothing short from what is known today
as MYTHICAL & LEGENDRY POWERS: Powers like Alchemy, Telepathy,
Levitation, the ability to move objects and control animals and
weather through Thought etc...
However,
humanity lost its innocence in the late stages of the Atlantean
experience.
The balance
between Spirit & Matter was broken, and a behavioral vision of
power was harnessed in which spiritual powers were abused for
selfish materialistic purposes.
The Polar
Imbalance that resulted from this growing imbalance effected the
earth in ways similar to how certain industrial behavior in
this century is doing by developing in a path that ultimately
damages the ozone layer, causing a chain of negative
environmental events, like The Melting Poles, The Rising Sea
Levels, El-Nenos & Tsunamis, and major coastal cities sinking as
a result...
The Atlantean
cycle ended in cataclysmic events that are beyond our current
imagination - events that are nothing short from being a
real-life definition of what the alleged Judgment Day is
supposed to look like....
Consequently,
Survivors of The Atlantean Fall were forced backwards 1000s of
years away from civilization and had to start this Adamic cycle
almost from point-blank.
Memory of
Atlantis survived in history only through Plato's dialogues, and
Atlantis is still considered by many skeptics as a Platonic
Myth.
The great
knowledge practiced in Atlantis was largely buried along with
the continent... Part of it was saved by some Atlanteans who had
intuitively anticipated the Tragic Fall of Atlantis and
accordingly left the continent prior to its complete
destruction...
Those conscious
Atlanteans carried with them the Ancient Gnostic Wisdom
and founded the civilizations of Ancient Greece & Egypt, and
certain monuments like the Pyramids of Egypt still stand as a
concrete witness till this moment to the kind of miraculous
knowledge that humanity once experienced...
If there was a
sober moment in time (in the recollect-able history) in which
there existed enough Polar Balance between the duality of Matter
vs. Spirit to allow the MIND to freely contemplate the
Cognitive nature of the LINK between the Kingdom of
Heaven & The Kingdom of Earth, it would have to be
the Ancient Greek Times which inaugurated the
civilizations of this final Adamic cycle....
It was a time
that came after the legendary wars of Atlantis and prior to the
Holy Invasions & Patriotic feudal wars & conflicts that
highlighted the religious journey of monotheism and its hidden
political agendas, which later along the centuries branched out
into more complex conflicts such as that of race, language,
cultures and communication...
The Great Greek
Minds, known in history as Philosophers,
particularly members of the Order of the Sacred Eight
(known to the Druze as El-Hudoud):
Pythagoras,
Plato,
Aristotle,
Socrates,
Parmenides,
Empedocles,
Plotinus,
Democritus - all encouraged a life of balance between Spirit &
Matter and promoted an education based on moderation that aims
at freeing the soul from all patterns of extremism, whether
Spiritual or Material.
At that time,
Spartans leaned more towards practicing physical extremism in
bringing up their youth a warrior upbringing, and on the other
hand many Atheneans leaned the other way through indulging in
spiritual extremism and were too absorbed by the power of the
Gods of Athens and the Oracle.
In Plato's
Academy, Plato set a curriculum that emphasized a balance
between the two human natures, Body & Spirit. He emphasized the
beauty in mathematical logic, geometrical proportion and musical
harmony... He considered mathematics to be a field of knowledge
that borders upon both The Spiritual and The Material forms...
Fields like
Mathematics and logic were introduced by Plato as Intermediary.
In other words, they were considered to belong to both the
Spiritual and the Physical world equally i.e. they are just as
instrumental in building a physical monument as they are in
understanding the secrets of the universe...
Physical Health,
on the other hand, was never underrated by those Great Greek
Minds. Plato taught that a healthy body reflects a healthy
mental state, and his curriculum included courses in gymnastics.
Those great men
really respected the Adamic nature on all levels: If The
Creator wanted to create humans as Ghost-Like spirits he would
have done so and saved humanity all the hassle of physical
existence with its ups and downs;
Thus, there is a
Divine Reason & Sacred Logic behind the Adamic heavenly/earthly
combination.
Those men also
understood that this combination is not only a temporary state
but it is the eternal fate of Adamics; and accordingly they
respected the logic behind the Doctrine of Reincarnation.
This is what
makes them really distinct from the Religious Institutions that
would follow for centuries after.
Those
institutions would later build empires upon empires of power and
dominion around the Mystery of Death and the Life After...
They would use Death and the concept of the Heavenly Sky
as a justification for promoting a physical education based on
hatred and neglect to the Adamic Form and Image, body torture
and physical shame became the pillars of such mentality - the
idea is that the human physique is a PERISHABLE source of SIN
...
When a friend of
Plotinus once was struck by a strong state of depression,
Plotinus advised him to change air and food, because according
to Plotinus, such psychological tendency does not spring forth
from of a healthy body. He did not advise him to go and pray his
way into a cure...
Pythagoras
associated the motion of the Planets in the Universe to the
notion of Music, and Plato used the term Music to refer to
a holistic academic program that involved mathematics, logic,
philosophy, science etc...
Aristotle had
great interest in biology, and his remarkable student Alexander
(Blessed be his name) brought back with him on each home return
specimen of rare animals and plants for Aristotle to study.
Aristotle also
taught Alexander The Science of Sematics (which is also
present among the Ancient Druze Manuscripts)... The science of
Sematics is based upon the strong relationship between how a
person looks on the outside with how he is on the inside...
Blessed
Hippocrates is, needless to say, The Father of Medicine....
The Impeccable
Pythagoras was known for practicing Gender equality... Among his
teachings is that the SOUL has no gender, and both men and women
should be treated equally; and his favorite student was a female
whose name was Theana...
Those great men
really believed that only through balancing between dualities
can man lead an honorable life of contemplation which ultimately
leads to The Sacred Knowledge of the LINK BETWEEN THE DUALITY OF
ALL DUALITIES - The Gnostic Duality of the Knower vs. Object
of Knowledge.
What is meant by the notion of
THE SACRED LINK will be gradually revealed as we go along
exposing the hidden implications behind Plato's Theory of Forms
which relates The Heavenly with The Earthly, The
Conceptual to
the
Perceptual
through defining
knowledge as being a Form of Recollection of the Realm of
Eternity through that takes form through the intricate
mathematics of our Perceptual Experience in Space & Time.
Plato's Theory
of Forms is by far the best introduction to THE UNIQUE FIFTH
SCIENCE around which the material I am presenting wholly
revolves...
Unfortunately,
any Messiah or Wise man that has ever walked upon the face of
this earth was attacked by ignorant men.
In Plato's
situation, the attack extended out long throughout history, and
those ignorant men sometimes called themselves philosophers
and intellectuals.
His Sacred
Theory of Forms, was undermined by those men for being too
IDEALISTIC.
Little did they
know that they were not simply judging a Greek philosopher, they
were judging a Messiah and a Great TIMELESS MIND whose work is
not any less holy than the holy texts.
Plato is often
blamed for highlighting a Dichotomy between Matter and
Soul in his Theory of Forms that paused a mental dilemma
at a time when Pagan Greece seemed quite happy and content in
its ignorance and blind allegiance to the Gods of Athens and the
Oracle.
Plato is said to
have came along and disturbed the Greek Pagan Innocence
by impelling the Greek mind to THINK OF THE NATURE OF EXISTENCE
rather than letting the Gods do the thinking...
As a result,
history of philosophy, as it progressed after Plato, is agreed
upon by many thinkers as nothing more than a GRAND REBELLIOUS
REACTION OR FOOTNOTES TO PLATO.
Another notion
those so called "Intellectuals" employed to express their deep
rejection to the Platonic spirit came in the ferocious
comparison between his philosophy and Aristole.
The basic claim
is that Aristotle's philosophy is more REALISTIC and
Down-to-Earth than Plato's.
Along the way of
dwelling on such an ignorant comparison, they depicted an
illusive philosophical rivalry between those two men.
Aristotle's
philosophy later received more popularity and applause in the
West and inspired the western scientific expedition, while the
Platonic philosophy was categorized more as Mystical or
Spiritual and became more associated with Eastern Mysticism in
another way of saying that it is TOO IDEAL.
To the Druze Understanding, this
is complete non-sense, Plato is the person of the
Wholly
Soul
and
Aristotle is the person of the
Wholly Word.
Each respected his position in The Sacred Order, and their works
intricately reflected such respect.
Both men
completed one another in the same way as The Word
completes The Thought that it is meant to express...
The Word
sounds obviously more sharp, clear-cut, evident and prominent
than The Thought; however, the mere fact that it is
better heard, is in no way meant to be a repelling factor
against the AUTHENTICITY of the thought that stands behind it.
The Thought
remains in its sacred mystery, beyond the expressive power of
The Word, and The Word, in turn, remains tied to
The Thought in ways beyond its nature or ability to escape,
and it forever remains short of fully reflecting the grand
majesty of The Thought.
Like two
chapters of the same Prophecy, Plato identified Forms as
Metaphysical Objects or Conception, and Aristotle linked
those Objects to the dimensional extremities of Perceptual
Experience.
Each went into a
unique depth in defining The Form, and this was narrowly
misconceived as being a form of rivalry or competitiveness
between the two.
Knowing who
those men are and what they stand for in The Kingdom of
Gnosis, it is simply absurd to believe or even begin
to hink that Aristotle's realism competed in any way with
Plato's idealism.
Each one of them
knew very well what he is here on earth to do and which level of
knowledge he is meant to reveal...
Both complete
one other in the same way as The Body completes The
Soul.
Yes, the body's
presence may be more evident, more prominent, and the body may
speak on behalf of the soul most of the time (if not all the
time), to the extent that the soul may seem almost non-existent
altogether;
However, at the
moment of death, the soul speaks ONE WORD that is worth a whole
life-time of speaking, by simply and gently departing the body
leaving it eternally speechless.
In short, those
two men's sacred works is beyond philosophical contrast &
opposition. It is natural for The Word to be more loud,
expressive and understood than The Thought; this does not
in any way mean that one's reality should be on the expense of
the other.
Being from the
MIDDLE EAST in this life-time, I would like to dedicate my work
to the WESTERN MIND. This is one of the reasons I chose to write
this work in English.
For centuries
now, there has been a growing level of ignorance and
misunderstanding highlighted by a historical fabrication of a
Contrasting Duality between THE EAST & THE WEST.
It seems that
such polarity seems to fit the political agendas of world
tyrants of this day and age as the Art of Polarity has
always done:
"Nothing is New
Under the Sun..." (The Sacred & Eternal Words of King Solomon)
On this
occasion, and prior to embarking upon the philosophical
introduction to the main subject of my work which is THE
FIFTH SCIENCE, I would like to reveal one more ancient
Gnostic secret:
The East's
relationship to the West is unwillingly victim to an ancient
miscommunication reflective of The Male's relationship to
The Female, or Yin's relationship to the Yang,
or the Alpha relationship to the Omega...
Such
miscommunication is in turn reflective of yet even more ancient
form of miscommunication - all of which could be traced back to
Eve's relationship with Adam:
THE SOUL'S
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MIND FROM WHERE ALL LANGUAGES OF CONFLICT
ORIGINATE.
Inside each one
of us, whether westerner or easterner, whether male or female,
those two powers reside, and miscommunication starts between the
female and male part inside each individual prior to descending
into the family level and later on to the community level and
then the cultural, religious, racial and thousands of other
levels....
The East
& The West complete one another even though they possess
two different ways to express themselves.
The East behaves
like a Male, who at times might be self-centered and completely
oblivious to the concept of The Other and how this other
perceives his character. He feels that the world revolves around
him anyways, and so there is no need to defend an image or mask
a behavior or beautify an intention. He does not like to be
caught in the language of self-defense, because he is poor and
illiterate in such respect. Even more, he considers speaking
such language as a weakness in itself. Accordingly, he often
appears like Acting Without Thinking as though there is no
tomorrow. In his mind he says: DEFEND MYSELF AGAINST WHO? He
simply cannot understand being judged based on CHARACTER. This
is why he is often misunderstood like any male accused of being
a male chauvinist...
This code of
behavior is completely rejected by the West for being Emotional,
Spontaneous AND SOMEWHAT POOR & NAIVE.
The language of
the West leans more towards the Yin or Omega frequency... The
West, like a female who is often forced to survive in a Man's
world, understands better the Power of Language &
Expression. As a matter of fact, the Western mentality
generally considers that:
IT IS NOT
IMPORTANT WHAT YOU SAY AS IT IS HOW YOU SAY IT
THE FRAME - THE
LOOK is Equally Important as Make Up is to a Woman
Self-defense to
the Omega Mentality is a STRATEGY and not a SIGN OF WEAKNESS...
The conflict
between East & West is marked by a WAR OF COMMUNICATION
reflective of that between a Man and a Women.
The Future is
more important to the woman than it is to the man who seems more
satisfied by the world as it is in the present. This renders the
East as being non-advancing as the West seems to be. Man is
mystified by the woman's ability to THINK AHEAD OF HER TIME as
much as the east is intrigued by the west's technological
advancement,
and in turn,
Woman is mystified by man's ABILITY TO EMBRACE THE PRESENT
WITHOUT TOO MUCH WORRYING ABOUT THE FUTURE.
The West tends
to measure civilization by how a woman is treated, and The East,
on the other hand, mocks such criterion and considers the
Western Woman to be enslaved by such civilization, carrying
responsibilities beyond her physical nature. ...
In fact, all
dualities, including female vs. male and east vs. west
originate from Adam & Eve (The Mind & The Soul) who are both
spiritual elements present in each one of us regardless of
his/her gender or nationality.
Each one of us
is both male and female.
This is why the
SECRET is to balance between those two natures inside and on an
individual level.
In order to do
so, one must understand that:
INSIDE THE
ADAMIC NATURE LIES THE EAST, THE WEST, and the MIDDLE GROUND -
THE JERUSALEM OF THE HEART...
Let the Eve
within each one of us return to her ancient place inside ADAM,
and let them both enter once more THE GARDEN OF EDEN - THE
PROMISED LAND...
Let us be ADAMIC,
not nationalists, not religious, not racist or sexist etc....
LET US LEARN THE
NEUTRAL LANGUAGE OF THE MIND. It has been mapped out for us in
Pythagoras Theory of Number, Plato's Theory of Forms,
Aristotle's Physics on Motion, Space &Time, Plotinus
Enneads, The Sacred Parmenedian Conception of The ONE
, and who is to forget the great SOCRATES who drank the POISON
saying:
"I AM TO DIE AND
YOU ARE TO LIVE,
AND LET US SEE WHO IS GOING TO THE BETTER DESTINY..."
Athens was never
again Athens after that moment, and history was divided into
pre-Socratic and pro-Socratic. It is unclear whether Socrates is
he who drank the Poison or THE CIVILIZATION OF ATHENS is who did
by allowing such injustice to take form, and ever since the
balance was broken and Athens went down and history took on a
dark turn...
SOCRA-THE
VILLAGE OF THE EONS.....
Blessed with the
grace of Eternity is he who believed and thus was secured and so
he entered the City of Beauty and sat on the Divans of Pytha the
Numerical, Socra the Village of the Aeons, Plo the light, Pla
the shadow, Aris the cause, Parmen the Eternal, Democ The
Secured, Empedoc The Overflow…"
PLATO's
THEORY OF FORMS
The Realm of
Eternity vs. The Realm of Space & Time:
Timeless Plato
is known to have been one of the pioneer minds in recollect-able
history to have discovered the Dual nature of existence.
According to
Plato, existence is divided into two realms: the Realm of
Eternity & the Realm of Space & Time.
The Platonic
Dualism
later on inspired philosophical and theological schools of
thought that would wholly revolve around derivative dualities:
the duality of The Heavenly & The Earthly, The
Spiritual & The Material, The Good & The Evil etc...
However, Plato
did more than pause a dilemma over the nature of existence as
some philosophy critics would later argue.
In his elaborate
Theory of Forms, Plato revealed a road-map that bridges the two
realms together. The Link, to Plato, is not about a
prayer or a ritual of some sort that the Gods up in the heavens
would at some point hear or behold and respond back to in due
time based on the holy axiom Ask and You Shall Receive,
but rather,
The Link
revolves around a unique science which centers around a logical
connection between
Conception
&
Perception.
The nature of
such Logic is unleashed through Plato's phenomenal
Theory of Forms.
It revolves
around the very nature of the Mind itself and its ability to
control both:
The Mechanism of
Heavenly Conceiving the Question
&
The Mechanism of
Earthly Perceiving the Answer
"The Creator
never grants permission for one to ask unless HE grants
permission for one to answer his own question..."
(The Ancient Druze Wisdom)
Accordingly, the
Eternal Realm, to Plato, is not beyond the Adamic
knowledge.
It is not
heavenly or transcendent in any religious or dogmatic sense.
On the contrary,
it intersects with the Spacio-temporal Realm through a
Matrix of Meaning that is knowledgeable.
In brief, to
Plato, the Realm of Space & Time is a Translation
of the Realm of Eternity. Contemplating the nature of
the Translation, one basically learns about the Object
Translated.
The Physical
Realm, according to Plato,
is somewhat of a
reflection or a copy of The Eternal Realm.
Through
contemplating the reflection or the copy, one recollects
knowledge of the original.
Everything in
the Spacio-Temporal Realm is a significant object of
contemplation: Space, the Sun, the Moon, Light and Darkness…
etc…
For example,
Space in its endlessness, resembles the Infinite
nature of eternity. The Sun, in the way it permeates vision of
objects, resembles The Mind which is the internal sun of
ideas and forms... Etc…
Plato, in his
Myth of the Sun and Myth of the Cave, hints to a
Mechanism of Perception, not a system of belief, that
links between the Absoluteness of the Realm of
Eternity and the Relativity of the Realm of Space
& Time.
He portrays the
two realms as alive and interactive with each other through a
Matrix of Meaning that is subject to contemplation and not
to blind worship.
In his Theory
of Forms, Plato indirectly reveals the mathematics of
such interaction – a revelation that would riddle both the
religious and the scientific rationale following Plato…
Both
institutions would instead reactively emphasize a mysterious
gap between the two Realms i.e. The Religious Institution
would accentuate a lapse of space or time of some sort that
supposedly separate between Earth and Heaven, This World and the
Other World…
Plato, in the
immaculacy of his mathematics of perception (as revealed through
his theory), demystifies the magic that would come to nurture
this mysterious gap or lapse between the two realms:
On the
cross-point of Adamic Cognition HERE & NOW and not through some
ghostly experience in some inexplicable future in some seventh
sky, is where the Vertical Line of Eternity Intersects
with the Horizontal Line of Space & Time.
Plato's Theory
of Knowledge:
According to
Plato, the Realm of Eternity precedes the Realm of
Space & Time. This form of precedence (as you will discover)
is not Time-Measured.
The Adamic Soul
(According to Plato) has encountered the Realm of Eternity
PRIOR to descending to the Realm of Space &
Time. Accordingly, the soul possesses knowledge of the
eternal realm prior to any empirical experience of it on the
spacio-temporal level.
Plato considered
knowledge to be innate and not acquired. It is a
process of recollecting or remembering in Space & Time
that which has already been encoded within the soul since
Eternity.
Through
encountering The Copy one recollects knowledge of The
Original or The Blue Print, which is somehow
encrypted within the soul in eternity and PRIOR to any
empirical experience in Space & Time.
For instance,
through encountering a particular apple in the physical realm,
one recollects knowledge of the eternal Form Apple.
Note that the
term descending here does not carry any religious
connotations. In the Platonic sense, descending relates to
moving downwards not from somewhere up in the heavens
towards somewhere down on earth, but rather from a state of
Absolute Consciousness of The One to a more Relative or
Subjective levels of awareness in which The Absolute One
is translated and disguised by The Many.
Accordingly, to
Plato, what separates between the two realms is not some
imaginary ladder that one climbs or descends through, but a veil
of ignorance or forgetfulness that could only be unleashed
through a process of recollection triggered by contemplating
THE NATURE OF EXISTENCE & THE ORIGIN OF FORMS.
Note also that
the term PRIOR as well, in the Platonic sense, is not
relative to any sequential or timely order, but to a logical
order of necessity ruled by a Matrix-of-Meaning that conjoins
the two Realms.
The order of
such precedence, as will be verified in The Unique Fifth
Science, is not a Timely Order as in the case of
one thing happening at a time before the time that
the other happens at, but rather an order which reflects a
different nature of precedence.
In order to
understand such nature, consider how the concept of Color
precedes the concept of Redness or the concept of
Double precedes the concept of Four-ness or how the
concept of Motion precedes the concept of Time-Passage.
In other words,
in Plato's order of Prior and Posterior, the latter
follows the former not as would number 2 successively follow
number 1, but as would both number 1 & 2 logically follow their
essential Species-of-Origin which is the Concept of
Number itself or The Numerical Possibility,
or:
As would The
Description of an object follows The Object Described.
The description
seems on one hand to follow the object described and on the
other hand, it seems to come hand in hand with it as an
inseparable element of the object.
Accordingly, to
Plato, it is not that the Eternal Realm once existed at a
time prior or after to the existence of the
Spacio-Temporal Realm (as monotheistic thought in general
would later depict).
For, according
to such logic, at some point in time, the Eternal Realm
must have seized to exist, and consequently, it cannot be
eternal.
To Plato, the
picture is more like the Eternal Realm superimposes
its Image and mathematics upon the Spacio-Temporal Realm
as would A Thought superimpose its image upon The Word
that expresses it - charging it with its power-of-meaning
(expressive power), or as would an Internal Emotion
superimpose its form upon the External Facial Expression
that translate it.
Thus, the
Eternal Realm, to Plato, is alive and interactive in nature
with the Spcaio-Temporal Realm - constantly providing it
with Form and meaning.
Accordingly, the
process of knowledge or recollection does not occur in a timely
consequential manner.
In other words,
it is not like initially at some pre-historic moment in time, in
some unknown dimension, the soul must have been exposed to the
Form Apple, and then as it encounters a particular apple
in space & time the image of the apple somehow enters the brain
hitting a nerve key that belongs to The Form Apple,
causing the brain to say: Aha, I Remember... this is an
apple...
This is more of
an empirical interpretation of Plato's Theory of Knowledge, and
it makes no sense to justify The Innate Logic through
The Empirical Logic.
Analyzing
Plato's conception of the two realms and the connection in
between, one discovers that the case is more like:
The Mind
emanates that very element which allows for the identity of the
apple to be encountered on the perceptual level in the first
place, with everything that perception could possibly mean.
For, according
to the Platonic logic, any object cannot possibly enter the
realm of perception unless in a descriptive mode to that
which precedes it on a conceptual level.
In other words,
What Happens Perceptually translates What
Already Exists Conceptually, and it progresses in space &
time descriptively, having no life of its own, in the same way
as the footsteps of a man may progress to reveal or describe the
meaning of walking.
Accordingly,
what is Taking Form or Happening in Space &
Time is never progressing or developing in an Informative
Mode i.e. never revealing the future or the unknown, but
rather, it progresses in a Descriptive Mode that
translates what already is on the conceptual level.
The Mind, to
Plato, is the Sun that superimposes the very element or context
through which the Realm of Perception altogether becomes
meaningful for what it is in the first place.
In the same way
as light superimposes the context of visibility, the mind
superimposes the context of knowledge-ability, transferring any
experience (whether conceptual or perceptual) into a
mind-relative dimension.
Accordingly, the
Perceptual Possibility in itself exists in the first
place as a translation or description of the Conceptual
Possibility, and the Translation cannot possibly
precede The Object Translated - it cannot precede the
element which justifies its existence in the first place.
Consequently,
what the perceiver basically encounters on the perceptual level
is reflections of his own Mental Conceptions in
three-dimensional form, appearing and progressing in a
descriptive mode.
Those
reflections are more like what Plato refereed to in his Myth
of the Cave as Shadows that deceptively appear on the
walls of the cave as though they have a story of their own, when
in reality they are only describing what is taking place outside
the cave - the reality symbolic of the eternal realm as lit by
the Sun (The Wholly Mind)
Existence is not
an added meaning arrived at through vision...
(An Excerpt from The Unique Fifth Science)
While any given
object that one encounters on the perceptual level (i.e. an
apple, a tree, a mountain) exhibits a number of perceivable
attributes integrated together (i.e. redness and roundness in
the case of the apple), it is somewhat absurd to claim that
those external attributes could ever sum up visually to amount
for the Identity Apple or account for what an apple is in
its Conceptual Finality.
True, redness
and roundness may seem on the immediate perceptual
encounter inseparable elements of an apple; however, it is not
essential that the mind thinks roundness or redness in order to
think Apple-ness.
The Apple, on
the mental level, somehow carries an immaculate identity of its
own that cannot be mixed up with the apple's perceptual
elements.
In other words,
in mind, the equation is never the following: redness +
roundness + fruitfulness + 1 + 1+ 1= Apple.
Such elements,
to the Apple's Conceptual Identity, are descriptive and
not informative; and as already mentioned:
A Description
can never precede The Object Described in any order of
precedence - neither in priority or in importance. T
he Description
is bound to The Object Described and not the other way
around.
Similarly, and
on a more complex level, if one happens to be sitting up on a
balcony of a building watching a man running across the street,
one's eyes are tempted to follow the steps of the man
informatively rather than Descriptively.
In other words,
the perceiver's eyes are tempted to follow the steps in a mode
of (1 Step +1 Step +1Step +1Step = Meaning), as though those
steps will lead into some piece of discovery of some sort, like
knowing at some point in space & time (in the near future) where
the man is heading to or what are those steps progressing
towards...
Lets assume that
someone walks out to the balcony and inform the perceiver that
this particular man down the street is A Runner.
The perceiver at
this point realizes that those steps are not developing
informatively, but rather descriptively... They are
simply translating what running as a concept already
means.
Accordingly,
those steps are somehow progressing towards the past and not the
future. They are describing What Already Is and not
What Is Yet To Become.
In conclusion,
the Eternal Realm of Forms, which Plato associates with
The Realm of Mind, seems to somehow superimpose its
context upon the perceptual experience in the same way as
Running superimposes its context upon The Man's Steps.
Accordingly,
everything that is in the Perceptually Happening is
basically a translation to What Already Conceptually Happened;
and
Conceptual Happening does not require Space, Time &
Physicality to be fulfilled, because such conditional
fulfillment would always be threatened by the possibility of
Not Happening.
In other words,
that which requires all those conditions to happen could be
prone not to happen, and what needs space & time and other
conditions to progress towards fulfilling its meaning, lacks
what it takes to be definite and meaningful in the first place.
The
Conceptual Happening, on the other hand, does not happen in
the sense that certain spacio-temporal events or conditions
bring about the fulfillment of its meaning.
Its happening
is rather more similar to the Apple's Happening - it
appears all at once.
Its Happening
= its What-ness or Platonic Form itself.
In other words,
the second the Mind identify an Identity or a What-ness,
the Mind places it within the circle of Happening
providing it with all what it takes to happen, and this is
precisely why blessed Aristotle considered perceptual objects
are at their best what they are the moment they are perceived
for what they are.
By this strange
note which seems to somehow deactivate The Empirical Logic
that Aristotle is made famous for, Aristotle alludes to the
active role that the Mind plays in charging the physical realm
with the context-of-meaning necessary for it to become
Possible, because the mathematics of such Perceptual
Possibility is forever tied and constrained to the
mathematics of Conceptual Possibility,
And, in as much
as the perceptual realm serves to translate faithfully what
precede it on the Mental level, in as much as it justifies its
Cause-of-Being and its Pregnancy with Possibility.
Aristotle
associated knowledge to a state of Dawning-on-the-Mind
and not to a state of arriving at meaning through vision.
After all the Meaning of Running dawns on the mind of the
perceiver suddenly, and it does not require the steps of the
runner to fulfill it.
Plato's Forms:
In his Theory
of Forms, Plato considers Objects and Occurrences
encountered on the perceptual level to be relatively
imperfect copies or imitations that partake from an absolute
metaphysical origin referred to by Plato as the
Eternal Realm of Forms.
For example, any
particular apple that one encounters on the physical level
derives its identity from an Absolute Form referred to as
The Form Apple, and this is the case with any other
object one may encounter in space & time...
Plato's
Categories of Forms:
Plato divided
Forms into three main categories:
Forms from which
physical objects partake: The Form Apple, The Form Tree,
The Form Mountain, The Form Sun, The Form Moon, The Form Rock
etc...
Forms from which
meta-physical objects partake: The Form Beauty, The Form
Happiness, The Form Equality, The Form Justice, The Form Good
etc...
Forms from which
Intermediary Objects (Objects that seem to belong to both
worlds) partake: Mathematical Forms like Numerical & Geometrical
Forms etc...
It is important
to note that Plato gave special attention to The Form SPACE
and considered it as reflective of a nature that is somewhat
beyond the nature of forms.
This notion will
become more evident as we go along examining the definition of
Existence in The Unique Fifth Science & its
relation to the ancient Greek definition of Absolute Oneness
as best introduced by
Parmenides...
A Remote Word
about those categories:
The Physical
category is obvious... It is what constitutes our perceptual
experience at large. Everywhere one directs his/her vision, one
sees physical objects of all shapes and kinds.
The Metaphysical
Objects are less obvious. One cannot inspect happiness in the
same way one does an apple. Happiness is more of an experimental
form than an observable one, and one seems to rely on a
reflective comparison between a perceptual experience of some
sort and an inner feeling or mental judgment in order to
identify the existence or the happening of metaphysical
forms like happiness.
Much is to be
said about the metaphysical category; however, one thing about
this category that is most important to note at this point is
that objects that belong to this category are only transmitted
into the perceptual level through the Adamic Image and
the Adamic Expressions and Actions in Space & Time. No
other power or creature in the physical world could bring Forms
like Beauty or Love or Equality into manifestation save The
Adamic Element. This point is to be remembered; for it
constitutes the central logic behind the theological emphasis on
the Sacredness of the Adamic Image...
As for the
Intermediary Objects, those are objects that seem to belong
to both worlds, the physical & the metaphysical... The nature
and significance of this category will be revealed in more depth
in the course of revealing the nature of The Link
that Plato establishes between the Perceptual and the
Conceptual world...
Absoluteness vs.
Particularity in Plato's Forms:
As already
mentioned, according to Plato's Theory of Forms, any
particular object encountered on the perceptual or empirical
level is supposedly a copy of an original and
eternal Blue Print referred to as The Form, from
where this object's innermost identity partake.
This Form is
constant, eternal and is that very essential element that makes
the object what it is in its finality, despite any
particular variations in space & time that this object may carry
over other objects of its exact kind.
For instance,
consider again the Form Apple: According to Plato's
theory, all particular apples that are to ever exist in space &
time, no matter how much they may differ among each other in
terms of size, color, taste, freshness etc.., derive their
identity or What-ness from one and the same original blueprint:
The Form Apple, which is absolute, eternal, non-changing
and somehow forever radiates the very element that makes all
those apples what they are in their Finality: APPLES…
In other words,
particularity (relative to any Form) is prone to expose
variations; However, despite such relative variations, The
Absoluteness of the Form (which is in this case The Form
Apple) transcends such variations and is not in any way effected
or changed by them.
According to
this Platonic premise, variations among particular apples in
space & time are not inherent elements of the Apple's
Identity. In other words, those particularities do not
effect or change anything in the absolute world of The Form
Apple.
However, the
real question that pauses itself on this level and will pause
itself again and again on many other levels is:
How can The
One (which is in this case The Form Apple) be One
& Many simultaneously? How can The Form Apple
preserve its eternal or absolute unity on one hand and yet enter
the relative realm of change and multiplicity on the other?
To understand
the answer to this question that is as ancient as philosophy is,
it is very important to comprehend the logic that constitutes
the Gnostic Order of Trinity introduced in the previous
chapters of this work.
So what then
accounts for those variations that rise on the perceptual level
and how could The Absoluteness of The Form APPLE
account for those countless changes & variations and yet remain
one and unchanged?
And if one
singular Form could account for such Many
variations, then how could this Form remain One and
similar to itself?
If not,
consequently, there would have to be countless forms of The
Form Apple in the realm of eternity (practically as many as
there are particular Apples in space & time) to account for all
the possible differences among those particular apples;
especially that, according to the law of particularity,
there cannot be found not even two particular apples in Space &
Time that are identical to one another...
According to
Plato's theory, those variations are accounted for by other
Forms like The Form Big for example and The Form Small,
The Form Red, The Form Green, The Form Rotten,
The Form Fresh.. etc...
For example, a
given green apple may differ from a given red apple, however,
not by virtue of identity (Apple-ness) but by virtue of color
which has nothing to do with The Form Apple itself.
In other words,
the The Form Apple remains untouched by such difference.
Such difference,
according to Plato's Theory, is accounted for by other eternal
forms such as: The Form Color, The Form Green and
The Form Red…etc
Each of those
forms that its own identity that cannot be mistaken In Mind
or on the Conceptual Level for another.
Similarly, the
green in a particular apple may differ from the green in a
particular plant; however, both forms of green-ness partake from
one, eternal and non-changing blueprint named: the Form Green.
The Form Green
provides for what makes a particular object identified as in
effect green, despite its degree of greenness or
difference in shade or gradation in relation to other particular
green objects in the physical realm…
The Form Green
itself is an Identity of its own. It is unified and at
peace with itself and cannot be divided, changed or affected by
differences among particular greens in space & time, because
such differences do not change the fact that those green objects
are Fundamentally Green in their finalities,
otherwise,
green-ness will
not be associated at all to those objects.
Such particualr
differences or variations, according to Plato, have other Forms
to account for such as The Form Light and The Form
Dark and The Form Poor and The Form Rich (i.e.
light green vs. dark green vs. rich green or poor green etc...)
Forms: Isolated
in Eternity, Integrated in Space & Time / Isolated Conceptually,
Integrated Perceptually:
The Platonic
logic on how relative particularities among objects of the same
species in space & time are accounted for on the absolute level
of forms sheds a new light on the nature of Plato's Forms:
Forms that are
seemingly separate from each other in The Realm of Eternity
or conceptually (i.e. the Form Apple / the Form Red / the
Form Round etc…) appear to integrate together or layer
upon one another on the the perceptual level in an inseparable
mode.
For example,
redness and roundness, which partake from two clearly isolated
concepts or Forms that cannot be mistaken in Mind for one
another (the Form Red and the Form Round), perceptually
amalgamate together in a particular apple in such an
inseparable manner, in such a way where it is impossible to
isolate or extract each on its own...
An apple in Mind
seems to be clearly an identity that has its own numerical
mental unity, and to conceptualize of an apple in mind obviously
does not require conceptualizing of redness or mandate any
specific interference of other images or concepts like roundness
or freshness or rottenness.
On the other
hand, in the immediate and particular perceptual encounter with
an apple, those forms seem to be parasitic upon each other and
upon the apple itself, in such a way where one cannot possibly
see the apple or touch it without seeing and touching the
redness and the roundness of it.
So, on one hand,
the Conceptual or Mental realm seems to support Numerical
Possibility through supporting numerical unity-of-form, and
on the other hand, the perceptual realm seems to do just the
opposite in denying such possibility.
For, while Forms
integrate on the perceptual level in an indivisible mode that
resembles less numerical unity and more the absolute or
Parmenidean
Unity
(the
infinite oneness that cannot be numerically framed
or divided), they isolate on the conceptual level each in its
own mental frame giving birth to the Numerical Possibility
and statistical accountability.
It is rather
interesting and somehow also ironic how Numerical Possibility
(on the mental level) serves to preserve the absoluteness of
each form's identity through framing and isolating it mentally
and preventing it from melting in the other form, yet
Numerical Impossibility on the physical level achieves
just the opposite by dissolving and defying the absoluteness of
each form's identity (through allowing it to conglomerate with
other forms and causing forms altogether to appear as one giant
soup referred to as The Physical Realm in which they mix
and melt together loosing their identities to each other)?!!!
This
Isolation of Forms on the mental level, yet Integration
of their Particulars on the physical level, exposes an
essential distinction between The Conceptual Realm and
The Perceptual Realm worthy of noting at this point.
The question is:
how could the mind identify, isolate & frame concepts
using numerical impossibility, knowing that the
Numerical Possibility itself cannot be possibly known or
acquired through empirical experience. Nothing in nature
resembles the Isolation that numerical possibility calls for -
everything out there is meshed together in a soup that better
serves to deny rather than resemble this possibility...
Thus,
numerical possibility could not be acquired empirically,
simply because nothing on the empirical level (in nature as we
know it) resembles anything like it.
Consequently,
the Numerical Possibility must then be somehow innately
encoded in the Mind prior to any perceptual or empirical
exposure.
This is in
perfect harmony with Plato's conception of knowledge as being
innate.
For now, it is
enough to understand that The Perceptual Possibility
cannot take form without a numerical context that the mind
frames perceptual objects and experiences through, and this
numerical context evidently emanates From The Mind Outwards
(and not the other way around), transforming anything
out there on the perceptual level into A Translation of Its
Possibility causing the redness to appear in a frame of its
own and the roundness and etc...
In short,
anything perceivable primarily translates The
Numerical One before translating anything else, by the
mere fact that it rises into the level of perceptual
identification.
Secondarily, it
translates other mental forms that in themselves cannot be
mentally identifiable without being as well isolated
numerically, again by virtue of the Mind's same mysterious
innate knowledge of the Numerical Possibility.
The question is:
if this mysterious numerical possibility is a Mental
Power of some sort that activates the Mind's ability to
identify forms both conceptually and perceptually, the source of
this power must then somehow be beyond the nature of the forms,
otherwise it will have to be in itself isolated or numerically
framed in Mind for what it is like any other form such as The
Form Apple or The Form Justice;
and if forms
supposedly account for everything existent both on the mental
and the perceptual level, then there must be some logical
connection between such power and the nature of forms - a
link of some sort that relates this power to forms.
What could the
nature of such connection be?
To answer this
question, it is necessary to identify how the numerical
possibility relate to the form. How does any numerical frame
relate to the meaning or object framed within?
Is the frame to
be considered a natural part of the object itself, or is it a
foreign element added unto the object as is a frame is added
unto a painting, for the sole purpose of framing it and not for
any essential purpose that bares relativity to the painting
itself?
If so, is the
frame then an object in itself?
And if the frame
has its own form, then could it be framed?
And if so, what
could possibly frame the frame and yet not be the frame itself?
All such
questions and more require a deeper look unto the nature of
Plato's Forms, especially the intermediary forms (that
Plato associated with numbers and geometrical shapes) and that
supposedly conjoins the conceptual realm with the perceptual.
If number is a
category of forms, then wouldn't this category be superior to
other categories?
if yes, how
would it be superior and yet remain of the same kind - a form?
How could it
possibly enter forms and yet somehow remain beyond forms?
And wouldn't
such superiority reveal a certain hierarchal order of
priority that rules the nature of forms?
Intermediary
Forms:
Some Forms,
according to Plato's theory, unlike the Form Apple or the
Form Green, cannot be verified perceptually anywhere in
nature or the physical realm.
For example, the
Form justice or the Form goodness is a form that
one clearly cannot empirically encounter or touch as one
encounters an apple or a plant or a rock or a green object.
One could only
authenticate the existence of such forms through a mental yes
of some sort that cannot be tested for validity on any empirical
level.
This ultimately
raises doubt concerning the existence of such
metaphysical forms in the absolute sense.
Consequently,
such forms are usually considered highly relative and
subjective...
In other words,
the possibility of each person or situation possessing its own
individual criterion of justice or goodness is a justifiable
philosophical concern; and the existence of an absolute Form
Goodness that supposedly accounts for all forms of relative
instances of goodness in space & time is highly questionable
based on the intangibility of such form.
The issue in
simple words is whether one could ever claim the absoluteness of
forms that cannot meet the eye; and if not, wouldn’t this raise
questions over the Absoluteness of The Realm of Forms
altogether?
The answer
according to Plato:
There are some
Forms that one cannot perceptually encounter anywhere in nature,
and yet one cannot possibly doubt or deny their existence or
validity.
Plato here
particularly refers to Mathematical Forms (both
Arithmetical and Geometrical). He defines those Forms as
Intermediary Forms that reside somewhat halfway
between the Seen and the Unseen - halfway
between the perceptual objects (like an apple) and the purely
conceptual objects (like justice or goodness).
Mathematical
Forms
(like circles and numbers), according to Plato, are
non-tangible. There is no actual circle out there in nature that
one could touch, neither is there a tree somewhere that bares a
fruit called number 1.
However, Plato
considers the existence of such forms to be patently obvious,
appealing to pure mental logic and common-sense.
The Pyramid
Khufu of Egypt for example is built to resemble a triangle,
although there is no actual triangle out there in nature.
Number 1 for
instance, not only influences but also constitutes all our
perceptual experiences in space and time, even on the most
physical levels; so much so, that blessed Pythagoras considered
the universe to be made out of numbers.
Every object one
sees one sees it in a numerical context in order to recognize
its individuality and account for its particular presence.
In other words,
any object one encounters in space & time appears as 1 before
appearing as anything else, otherwise it could not be possibly
identified on any level.
The question is:
how could the perceiver see the 1 without ever actually seeing
any object that could be referred to as being The Object 1
in space & time?
Mathematical
Forms thus seem to influence both our conceptual ability to
isolate ideas in mind and our perceptual ability to recognize
objects in nature.
They seem to be
present in everything we encounter, yet they are impossible to
see.
They seem to
somehow belong to both worlds, the physical & the metaphysical;
and this renders them somewhat superior to other forms.
According to
Plato, the possibility of Forms that we cannot encounter
physically to exist in such undeniable way paves the way for the
validity of purely metaphysical forms like beauty and justice to
exist as well despite the fact that they cannot be visually
verified in the way objects like an apple is verified.
The Form One and
Perceiving Objects:
If there is a
form among all mathematical forms worth examining, it must be
indeed The Form One.
Unlike the
Form Circle, to which certain objects in nature bare certain
resemblance to (like the Sunflower's core for instance), nothing
in nature bares any resemblance to The Form One.
There is nothing
in the physical realm which one could lay his/her hands upon and
say: I have a grip over The Particular Object One
.
However,
doubting the Absolute Existence of such Form, is like
doubting the ability to perceive or conceive of anything.
For, without
what appears to be The Mind's Innate Knowledge of The Form
One, no particular empirical or conceptual experience of
any sort could ever take form.
For example,
when one perceives a particular apple in space x and time y,
what the Mind seems to be doing prior to identifying or
registering the image of the apple, is basically mentally
attributing Numerical Identity to the Object at Hold
primarily in order to isolate and verify its meaningful identity
or What-ness on the Conceptual Level and
secondarily in order to recognize its statistical
particularity on the Perceptual Level (i.e. its
relation to other objects around it that in some cases could be
exactly similar to it).
In other words,
The Form One, in this sense, is not merely a
numerical tool of counting, but it is the Frame-of-Context
without which no Identity could ever emerge or withhold for what
it means in the first place, prior to even emerging as a
countable statistical object.
Thus, anytime
one sees any object, one is basically seeing The Form One
in disguise.
This renders
The Form One the most ancient and superior form of all
forms, because all other forms seem to follow it
descriptively and no other form could ever emerge without
it.
To put it in
simpler terms, The Form One could be compared to
Sunlight in relation to Vision .
It is a power
that is somehow emanated from the Mind (The Metaphysical
Internal Sun), and directed outwards, permeating knowledge of
all objects on all levels, yet never appearing as a
knowledgeable object in itself.
In conclusion,
without the mind's pre-knowledge of The Form One, no
perception or conception of any sort could ever take form,
because any object of perception or conception must be contained
within a Frame-of-Unity or Oneness in order to be identified
both as a Meaningful Identity and as a Statistical
Object.
So, wait a
moment!!! lets rephrase what we got here:
In order to
perceive any object in space & time, the perceiver needs to
first mentally identify and authorize a Form which the Mind
seems to innately validate as existent and yet which vision
cannot actually see or verify anywhere in space & time!!!
Isn't this
another way of admitting that forms could be Absolute
beyond empirical verification and that knowledge of Forms is
ultimately innate beyond empirical experience?!!
Such admittance
is conclusive on many levels, and it carries very positive
implications over the validity of the Absolute Existence
of purely metaphysical Forms like Beauty, Justice and Goodness
etc...
For, such forms
are not any more metaphysical in nature than The Form One
which seems to so obviously exist and beyond any reasonable
doubt.
The Form One and
Perceiving Motion:
Not only
perceiving objects, but also perceiving motion of any kind seems
to require pre-knowledge of the Form One.
Consider the
basic motion of an apple falling from a tree unto the ground:
If a
motion-picture camera is to tape a second worth of such motion,
it would require a sequential order made up of at a number of
frames / second - 24/Second for example - each numerically
separated from the other;
The ability to
register or recognize such motion on the screen would rely on
human-vision's ability to somehow register each and every frame
separately and somehow recognize the difference between each
frame and the one that comes after in order to recognize the
change in the apple's position in space - which ultimately
accounts for recognizing the overall motion.
In other words,
to say that regular vision is capable of recognizing the
mechanism of such screen-motion is another way of saying that it
is capable of identifying each singular frame out of the 24 and
comparing it to the frame before and the frame after.
Viewing a screen
segment of such motion is an experience not that different in
terms of the mathematics and mechanism of perception from that
of a real life experience,
because,
The perceiver in
a real-life experience is basically using the same faculty of
sight to see the same type of motion.
From here, one
could safely assume that:
Prerequisite to
the eye's ability to register sight of any motion on the
empirical level is some form of innate or mental pre-knowledge
of the Form One.
To even perceive
any given motion within any frame of meaning such as the frame
of The Apple Falling from a Tree, one requires a
numerical frame of some sort in order to separate this instance
from other instances or occurrences that takes form
simultaneously and momentarily everywhere one looks around.
Thus, not only
perceiving the mechanism of motion relies on the numerical
possibility, but also placing such mechanism within any frame of
context or meaning relies on this possibility as well.
It all simply
relies on the Mind's innate knowledge of the Form One.
The Form One:
The Form One,
in the Platonic logic, must not be confused for The Numerical
1.
The nature of
such Form is simply beyond number.
Blessed Parmenides
of
Elea spoke of such nature when he described in his famous poem
the:
"One
that is absolute, eternal and beyond limitations -
the One that has no beginning and no end,
that is neither created nor destroyed..."
Such Oneness
reflects an Indivisible form of WHOLENESS that almost
resembles the infinite frameless nature of space...
As already mentioned in the
early chapters, knowledge is hierarchal in nature, and
each level of knowledge translates the level that precedes in
this hierarchy i.e. Conception
translates
Consciousness,
and Perception
translates Conception
etc...
The more the
translation descends from one level to the other, the more it
becomes less faithful to the original meaning.
When we speak of
the Platonic Forms, we speak of the Realm of
Conception,
which basically translates the
Pythagorean
Unity: the frameless unity that is reflective of the nature
of Consciousness.
In turn, when we speak of the
Aristotlean Forms, we speak of the Realm of Perception which
translates the Platonic
Unity : the numerical unity that
is reflective of the nature of Thought.
Remember that in
the LAW of Gnosis: Knowledge = Translation,
And, anything
that is translated is somehow DISGUISED in the process.
The Creator is
disguised by the Wholly MIND, and the Wholly MIND is disguised
by the Wholly SOUL, and the Wholly SOUL is disguised by the
Wholly WORD and etc... = The Frameless ONE is disguised by The
Numerical 1, and the Numerical 1 is disguised by the
3-Dimensional Extremities of particulars... etc..
Any Platonic
Form, such as The Form Apple or The Form Tree or The Form
Mountain or The Form Beauty etc.., translates a unity that is
more reflective of the Uniqueness of the Original Framelss
ONENESS that Parmenides spoke of.
Accordingly, any
Identity acquires a Meaningful-Frame-of-Unity that
accounts for its PLATONIC SIGNIFICANCE TO KNOWLEDGE (ITS
WHAT-NESS) prior to acquiring a Numerical Frame of 1-ity
to account for its Aristotlean Significance (its spacio-temporal
condition or statistical presence and accountability as a
physical object in space & time).
Number itself,
as an Identity, projects an absolute Platonic meaning, prior to
carrying any numerical implications...
Number is a
meaning in itself that is beyond numerical implications in the
same way as color projects a meaning that is beyond redness or
whiteness or yellowness etc....
Color, as a
Platonic Form, is translated on the Aristotlean or Perceptual
Level through the redness, yellowness or whiteness of any
particular object and is confirmed through an immediate visible
encounter with this object etc...
On the other
hand, the Numerical 1, unlike color, is not immediately
confirmed on the physical level as is redness or yellowness.
It is rather
translated perceptually through a cognitive process of reducing
a given objects' extremities in space & time to a numerical 1.
Accordingly, all objects in
space and time (that possess
physical extremities) are potentially reducible into equal and
neutral units of number (referred to as numerical instances),
regardless of how those extremities relate to those objects'
meaning or Platonic form.
All objects in
this sense, regardless of their identities, are somehow equal to
each other by virtue of their numerical value.
A little ant is
not any less numerically 1 than the grand SUN...
Thus one could
say that numerical 1-ness is neutral to the object's
expressive form or Platonic Significance that ultimately
relates this object to Higher levels of Meaning or Knowledge
(consciousness).
Any object is
simply treated as a statistical possibility.
Its relativity
of numerical 1-ness to the object reflects only one form of
relativity which is how matter interacts with the nature of
space under the assumption that space is an empty container.
Accordingly, any
object is somehow generalized in terms of its occupational
presence in space, and then this presence is reduced into a
numerical unit or value called number.
All objects,
regardless of their shapes, sizes or meaning, are basically
equal numerically.
The tendency to
treat all objects as equal in any sense reflects a very
deceptive level of translation that becomes highly distractive
as it resonates cognitively on the level of thought.
As you will
discover later on, treating all thoughts equally by virtue of
their numerical status in the mind is a very destructive
psychological tendency.
For now, it is
enough to understand that the Realm of Forms is Hierarchal in
nature, which is contrary to what the numerical logic reflects
in its finality. Beyond what is observed about the nature of
Plato's Forms so far, this is one important observation worth
mentioning at this point.
Seeing how
certain forms like the Form One influences the conceptual
experience at large, and comparing such Form to other Forms like
the Form Apple or Mountain, one cannot but notice The Hierarchal
Order of Priority that rules the nature of Forms.
For example, the
Form Red is not the same as The Form One. We've just given an
example on how the Form Red could be translated upon any visible
encounter with a red object. The Form One, on the other hand, is
translated on all levels of encounter at all times.
Whenever any
identity of any sort emerges conceptually or perceptually, the
Form One is translated.
In other words,
the Form One is more prevalent and skeletal than the Form Red.
In turn, the
Form Red is more prevalent than the Form Apple.
Consider the
difference between the Form Red and the Form Apple: Redness
layers upon many red objects in space and time, while Apple-ness
doesn't layer save upon very limited and specific objects
referred to as apples ..etc...
The Form Two =
The Birth of the Numerical 1:
It is already
clear that anytime the mind perceives any given object in space
& time, the mind somehow translates the 3-dimensional
extremities of this object into a numerical value (a numerical
1) or maybe recognize the relativity of those extremities with
the numerical 1.
What is yet
unclear is the underlying logic behind such translation.
In order to
translate the extremities of a given object into a numerical 1,
the mind indirectly translates the space around this object into
a Relative or a Meaningful Emptiness (a
numerical 0).
This zero is
supposedly highlighted by the way physical objects in general
interact with space, and in this sense, there are practically as
many 0s as there are objects (1s) in space.
Later, we will
reveal the absurdity of such logic, as we dive deeper into the
nature of Space and the 1 vs. 0 Polarity.
However, for
now:
Imagine a
universe made up of infinite space and only one object in it,
would it make any sense in such a universe to reduce this object
into a numerical value?
Would the
tendency to do so still exist?
Wouldn't
numerical possibility itself in such a universe be under
questioning?
For, there would
not exist any physical representation of what accounting in
terms of number means?
However,
considering that knowledge is innate and not acquired, one could
still assume that numerical possibility would some how still
linger somewhere?
However, even in
such a case, numerical possibility would still seize to be known
for what it is; because, according to the Law of Gnosis
or Knowledge, anything that enters the realm of existence must
enter the realm of knowledge and consequently must somehow be
translated; otherwise, it might as well not exist altogether...
In order for the
concept of number to be translated in any universe, it
requires at least two objects in space. We are here precisely
referring to the spacio-temporal extremities of those two
objects and the relative emptiness that stands as a deceptive
zero in between.
In other words,
one could think of the origin of number as an aftermath or a
byproduct of an ethereal-silhouette-like-emptiness that
pauses as an object in itself between the two objects.
Consequently,
not only Numerical Oneness but also Numerical Two-ness
(as a concept) transcends number in precedence and priority;
because, number, for what it seems to stand for in terms of
being a tool of accountability (an accounting tool), is somehow
totally reliant upon the pre-existence of the concept of The
Relative Other.
This is not to
be confused for implying that Two-ness translates number,
because then two-ness would be as inferior to number as the
translation is to the object translated; but rather, what is
really meant here is that number itself as a concept (prior to
its numerical implications) emerges in its most original form as
a translation of the nature of two-ness.
In other words,
The form Two precedes The Form Number in the Hierarchy of Forms.
So what would
Two-ness be prior to being a numerical value?
Two-ness, like
any other concept, in order for it to be recognized as an
Identity of its own, must somehow reflect a form of unity - it
must somehow be a unified meaning by itself, before being what
it is numerical-wise.
This is simply
how any identity or meaning emerges into knowledgeable
existence.
In order for
two-ness to be as such, it must somehow reflect The One
(unity) prior to carrying any numerical implications (i.e. prior
to representing the mathematics of 1 + 1).
If Two-ness is
to ever translate Unity in such a way, it would have to
translate the possibility of a form of division or separation
that is relative to the ONE (The Original Oneness and not the
numerical 1).
However, such
form of frameless ONENESS (that supposedly also exists before
number), is obviously indivisible...
The only image
of division or separation that could possibly bare any form of
relativity to such ONENESS must be reflective of that which
characterizes how The Absolute Unity of Consciousness is
translated by The Duality of Knowledge (The Knower vs. The
Object of Knowledge) which is reflected earlier in the
divine order of trinities - it would have to reflect the
Divine Order of Spiritual Creation...
However, the
only logical justification for the emergence of Two-ness for the
sole purpose of translating Oneness, is if the two-ness somehow
works against its own nature so as to project an overall image
of Unity.
In other words,
in the Gnostic truth-in-Finality, the only way Two-ness could
possibly relate to ONENESS is in as much as Duality could
possibly serves to translate the nature of INDIVISIBLE UNITY,
which is basically another way of saying in as much as
two-ness succeeds in denying its own numerical possibility...
Remember this
point, because it highlights the skeletal logic around which is
built the Far Eastern line of thought that advocates
renunciation of duality as the only path to authentic unity
(unity = non-dualism)
According to
this Far Eastern line of thought, the path to the ultimate
ONENESS that constitutes Consciousness or Existence is not
through a method of adding 1 + 1 = 2 (A Piece of Knowledge +
A Piece of Knowledge = leads to = Consciousness), but
rather
Not 2 = 1.
What this Not
2 basically translates into is = No to The Knower as 1 &
No to the The Object of Knowledge as another 1 = YES TO UNITY
IN ITS MOST ORIGINAL FORM (CONSCIOUSNESS)...
The practice of
this magical mantra, according to the Far Eastern mind, requires
increasing your mental ability to focus on one thought as a
preliminary way of training the mind to renounce anything it
identifies as numerically 1, which basically means ultimately
renouncing the overall logic-of-causality that influences the
emergence of the numerical 1 on any level ... It also means
denying the validity of the addition method altogether i.e.
exterior events do not progress informatively but rather
descriptively, and the description is not all that necessary to
the essential existence of the object described...
The method is to
renounce all numerical instance even if this means to ultimately
renounce renunciation itself based on the formula of
No No = Yes
(An Ultimate Negation of Negation itself translates into a
circle of existence Surrounded by the giant Overflow of YES on
all levels) CONSCIOUSNESS...
The idea is that
in allowing the numerical 1 to emerge on the level of thought
you are creating a reason for experiencing its translation on
the level of perception.
Remember,
according to the metaphysical nature of Adam's fall (as
introduced earlier), the original sin revolves around a
Moment of Blindness in which the Wholly Mind envisions His
self as numerically separate from The Creator.
Allowing the
emergence of the numerical 1 on any mental level translates the
mathematics of this ancient error on all levels.
This is the
magic of how eternity interacts momentarily with space
& time, superimposing its logic upon it in every second.
For, every
Adamic Mind is still tasting the bite of that same bitter
poisonous apple that Adam supposedly tasted on behalf of
humanity at large in some alleged edenic past.
The mind, in
allowing the numerical 1 to emerge, it is constantly allowing
itself to be in a mode-of-admittance to the presence of
duality and approval for this duality to be translated on all
deceptive levels, which automatically means living in a constant
mode of denial of the presence of the real ONE which is the only
form of presence that justifies the mind's presence in the 1st
place = SELF DENIAL
Thus, the Soul
(which is the thinking mind we are referring to here) is being
unfaithful to the translation or to the reason why it was
created in the 1st place.
On the Gnostic
level, this means being severed or separated from the source of
life or what is biblically referred to as The Fountain of
Life or EDEN.
It means that
the Mind, as A Knower, is separated from the 1st Object of
Knowledge (The Creator) by The Frame of Two-ness (casting one's
self outside the context of BEING IN EDEN WHERE FATHER & SON
DWELL TOGETHER AS ONE and instead being imprisoned within the
context of the "Adamic Fall".
We've already
explained in the early chapters how the behavioral tendency to
conceive of the One or frame the One mentally casts the trinity
of knowledge outside consciousness, and how a behavioral
perception influenced by such tendency ultimately casts the
trinity even further away down from its conscious origin.
Points to
Remember:
Framing the One
numerically is an ancient behavioral tendency that the mind
practices momentarily through thought.
In doing so, it
translates The Nature of the Original Sin which originally cast
Adam out of heaven.
The most ancient
and original Image of Separation is a separation that
comes in the form of a dream-like experience in which the Wholly
Mind envisions himself numerically separate from The Creator,
and thus, the mathematics of this separation are translated on
all levels of knowledgeable existence that would follow.
Space & Time:
As already
explained, numerical experience on the perceptual level is
strongly related to the nature of space and how physical objects
interact with this nature.
When Plato
categorized Forms, he stopped at the Form SPACE and
considered it as very unique and special.
Consider SPACE:
If Forms like
infinity or absoluteness are to ever be translated perceptually
(in compliance with the Law of Knowledge), the closest image to
such translation would be an Image of Space.
Can one say
existence exists somewhere in particular or eternity happens at
time x or infinity is countable or absoluteness is surmountable?
Similarly, can
one say Space falls in a given space?
Space is what
seems to underlie all the particularities of objects in the
physical realm, yet the question is:
Is it ever a
particular Object in itself?
Could it ever be verified as an object irrelative to its
containing nature?
Could it ever be accounted for numerically, knowing that
numerical possibility requires physical extremities to be
translated into knowledgeable existence?
Does the Space
within the Occupation of a given Object x differ from the Space
without (outside object x)?
The space within
seems disguised by the Object's physical particularity
(3-dimensional form), however, does this make such
space particular in it self?
If yes, then: is
this particular space considered an Emptiness
of Objects made full by the Object, or is it a Fullness
of Space squeezed empty by the Object?
And consider if
there were no objects in space to begin with:
would the
concept of emptiness itself be translated into
knowledgeable existence on any level? Or is such image of space
as being equal to emptiness not absolute but strictly relative
to the way objects interact with space on a particular level?
Could one
consider the space immediately outside the occupation of an
object as apparent? or is it only delusively highlighted into
some form of acknowledgeable presence by the 3-dimensional form
of the Object itself. If so, such space would only be recognized
as apparent by virtue of the empty vs. full polarity that
is strictly specific to the relativity of objects to the nature
of space and never in any absolute sense?
So, if you have
ever thought that the Absoluteness of the Platonic Realm of
Forms as mind boggling, you must not go far in your
imagination?
Behold SPACE…
It is a real-life translation of what Absoluteness could look or
feel like…
However, knowing
that it is in the nature of translation to always bare some form
of a twist that ultimately disguises the truth of the original
meaning being translated, you should behold space cautiously...
Consider Time:
Time seems very
similar to space in its nature. Can one say space falls in space
x. Similarly, can one say Time happens at time x?
It sounds absurd
doesn't it?
Time, in its
infinite nature, resembles Space... One can consider Time as the
Mind's Infinity: The Mental Space...
Mental Forms or
Thoughts fall within the Mind's Space.
Thoughts, like
objects, could be said to have extremities of some sort,
otherwise the mind would not be able to register any form of
awareness to any given thought, which means basically the mind
never being aware of thinking.
As already
explained, the extremities of physical objects in space
translate numerical possibility on a perceptual level, through
formulating relative spatial intervals in between.: object 0
object 0 object 0 etc...
Similarly, there
seems to be some kind of a cognitive interval - a particular
emptiness of some sort that separates among thoughts on the
mental level.
Let us refer to
this interval as: a relative mental space that initially
falls between at least two thoughts in mind: thought 0
thought 0 thought 0 etc....
If the concept
of time is to ever be translated at any knowledgeable level, it
would have to translate through the nature of such mental space
which gives birth to numerical possibility in its most raw and
virgin form.
Thus, one could
think of time as a mental continuum similar to space that is
somehow divided numerically through thoughts into relative
mental numerical units - later generalized and reduced into
equal units of value like minutes or seconds.
The same way,
space (as a continuum) is divided by physical objects into
relative spaces.
However,
remember, neither space nor time are divisible into absolute
equal units.
We have already
revealed how number cannot possibly be what it claims to be in
terms of representing unitary equality of some sort, by showing
how the extremities of objects in space which account for
numerical value are particulars that cannot ever be identical
to each other in the absolute numerical sense of equality
needed to reduce those extremities into equal units of value
(even if we're talking two same-sized green apples).
Similarly,
thoughts (being the mental objects), cannot be identical to each
other in any absolute numerical sense in order for time (The
mental space) to be divided by them into absolute values like
minutes or seconds.
Blessed
Aristotle, in his physics, spoke extensively on this subject,
and he gave an example on how one thought could seem like
eternity (time-wise) if one is absorbed by it and how an abrupt
motion in thought could stir numerical wakefulness which
ultimately accentuate awareness of time, and how an acceleration
in such motion generally speeds up the mind's awareness to time.
The ultimate
example to such awareness is counting seconds in mind. In doing
so one is basically thinking 60 thoughts per minute..
The Numerical
One and the Form ZERO:
000110101000001111111111111111111111110000000
Numerical
oneness, as already shown, is translated on the perceptual level
through the 3-dimensional extremities of objects in space &
time.
Numerical Two-ness,
in turn , is translated perceptually through a space interval
between 2 objects that reflects a mental image of separation...
The question is:
what translates the numerical zero-ness?
Zero-ness,
assuming that it exists conceptually, in order to possess any
knowledgeable existence, must somehow be translated
perceptually.
Zero, on the
conceptual level, represents some form of NUMERICAL
NON-EXISTENCE or EMPTINESS.
Before examining
the possibility of such emptiness on the mental level, let us
see if there is anything out there in nature or the physical
realm that could possibly translate such emptiness or even
resemble it in any way.
One need not
search far or long...
The possibility
of such emptiness translated externally, obviously revolves
around the nature of SPACE.
In other words,
space seems to be the only existing identity out there that
could possibly resemble or reflect the concept of zero.
However, Space
is not inherently empty in the zero-sense.
Emptiness of
Space is only relative to the way physical objects interact
visually with the nature of space;
one could only
say a particular emptiness-of-space is made full by a
particular-object, which is like saying this particular
space could be as well emptied from this object.
If space is
inherently empty, it could not then be "emptied", for, how could
emptiness be emptied and yet still be considered emptiness?
To understand
this point better, imagine a world where there is only space and
no objects in it, would emptiness as a possibility in itself
translate on any level in such a world?
And, if space is
only empty in relation to a particular fullness, how could
emptiness contain fullness? how could that which is
supposedly "0" (zero) contain "1" inside it?
However, on the
other hand, If space does not have what it takes to account for
zero-ness on the perceptual level? What does account for
it then?
One could argue
that numerical-oneness, even though unseen, is still
somehow accounted for Perceptually through the 3-dimensional
extremities of particular objects in space.
However, what
accounts for numerical-emptiness in space and time?
IF ZERO-NESS
CANNOT POSSIBLY BE ACCOUNTED FOR PERCEPTUALLY THROUGH SPACE
ITSELF (KNOWING THAT EMPTINESS IS NOT AN INHERENT NATURE OF
SPACE),
AND IF ZERO-NESS
CANNOT EVEN RISE INTO THE PERCEPTUAL LEVEL NUMERICALLY.
What could
possibly account for zero-ness?
THE ONLY
POSSIBILITY LEFT IS FOR ZERO-NESS TO BE SOME FORM OF A
VIRTUAL EMPTINESS IMAGINED TO BE LURKING SOMEWHERE
UNDERNEATH THE OCCUPATIONAL PRESENCE OF A GIVEN OBJECT IN SPACE.
HOWEVER, FOR
SUCH FORM OF AN ILLUSORY EMPTINESS TO EVEN CLAIM ANY PERCEPTUAL
PRESENCE EVEN ON A RELATIVE LEVEL, IT WOULD HAVE TO ASSUME THE
ACTUAL FORM OR 3-D EXTREMITIES OF THE OBJECT THAT IT SUPPOSEDLY
RESIDES UNDERNEATH, WHICH IS THE SAME FORM THAT THE
NUMERICAL-ONENESS or PRESENCE ASSUMES.
SO WAIT A
MINUTE:
THAT SAME
ELEMENT WHICH PROVIDES FORM TO THE NUMERICAL-PRESENCE or 1-Ness
IS THE VERY SAME ELEMENT THAT PROVIDES FORM TO NUMERICAL ABSENCE
or 0-Ness (ZERO)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS IS LIKE
SAYING THAT ZERO-NESS IS A GHOST-LIKE OR IMAGINARY OBJECT MADE
OF EMPTINESS THAT OCCUPIES A PARTICULAR SPACE AND STRICTLY THAT
SPACE UNDERNEATH ANY PHYSICAL OBJECT - ASSUMING THE EXACT 3-D
EXTREMITIES OF THE OBJECT AT THAT GIVEN TIME.
Thus, the
universe according to such image of zero-ness is like the
negative of a photo: space in it is like one big solid object
which is carved hollow by zero-objects in it that are supposedly
molded of a substance called emptiness.
This sounds
absurd, doesn't it?
What is even
more absurd is that zero-ness, on one hand, is a concept built
on the assumption that Space = Emptiness, and on the other hand
this emptiness is somehow treated like an actual object or a
particular fullness of some sort
Blessed Plotinus,
in his Enneads, alluded to this delusive identity of zero-ness
when he spoke of the metaphysical nature of evil. He defined
such nature as being:
"The Form
Not-NESS clinging on to affairs..."
further
describing it as:
"The delusive
Absence of Form in the wake of the obvious Presence of
Form..."
In other words,
Plotinus compares zero-ness to a a state of Not-Ness On the
Shape & Form of the Object.
This Not-ness
uses the numerical possibility of this particular object in
order to claim some form of an absolute identity for itself.
As for the
reason why Plotinus associates the nature of Zero-ness or Not-ness
with the nature of Evil-ness:
Zero-ness
sustains its delusive presence through utilizing a particular
Object's Form for the ultimate purpose of Denying this very form
that is supposedly granting it with its presence and breathing
life and sustenance to it...
This pattern of
behavior, in itself, translates the meaning of self-destruction
i.e. to use what makes you alive in order to kill it...
For, while, an
object's obvious presence cannot be denied or negated
perceptually, it could be doubted mentally, and this is exactly
what zero-ness translates into: DOUBT.
Doubt is made of
the mental possibility of a mental-not-ness or zero
existing outside on the perceptual level, and it is a vicious
circle which breeds in a mental environment causing Cognitive
Noise that translates perceptually into demented or
disturbed behavior.
Anything that
emerges as numerically 1 on the conceptual level is
immediately faced by a repelling thought that represents zero-ness
and which claims the power-to-negate or delete this numerical
1.
In reality,
Space ,which supposedly represents emptiness does behave as such
- it does not delete or repel objects, on the contrary it
embraces and contain them.
However, as this
thought is translated perceptually (in compliance with the law
of translation), it is faced by the obvious presence of the
object in space which is a reality that cannot be emptied or
deleted, however it could only be doubted for a second.
This is the
exact mathematics of evil: DOUBT...
Understanding
this point is pivotal because it reveals the WISDOM behind THIS
PHYSICAL REALM WHICH IS ON SOME LEVEL CONSIDERED A PRODUCT OF A
MISTAKE,
YET THIS MISTAKE
IN ITS FINALITY IS NOT A DIVERSION FROM GOD'S PLAN.
We have just
given an example on how the physical possibility (that is
supposedly a fallen or diverted translation of the metaphysical
possibility) could possibly defy the evil (the repelling nature
of zero-ness) and diffuse it into mere doubt.
This is one
obviously positive attribute of the physical nature, and
understanding it leads to understanding:
Why the Creator
in his Limitless Nature wished something that ultimately led to
the existence of this Physically Limited World?
LET us
take this analogy one step deeper into the MENTAL SPACE: TIME
We
have seen the maximum that
zero-ness could
translate into perceptually or
physically. We have yet to
examine what accounts for its metaphysical presence in mind in
the first
place.
The
supposition that emptiness could
possibly exist mentally (in the mind somewhere) revolves around
the nature of
TIME,
specifically time's
numerical
nature....
The
concept of time has changed
across
history. In the ancient Greek times, Aristotle associated time
with
motion, and he linked this motion with the notion of change that
takes form on
the
level of thought i.e. awareness of time originated from one's
awareness to
the
change that takes form on the level of thought.
Previously, this change used to be
represented by a smooth overall motion like the motion of sand
in the hour
glass.
Later on it grew to resemble more of an abrupt motion like the
motion of
the
ticking arms of a clock. In the modern digital age, it has grown
to be even
more
and more numerical so as to exhibit complete separation between
the
fractions of this motion...It came to resemble the process of
counting 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9
etc...
Between each
number counted and the
other
seems to be some form of an emptiness, a pause or an abrupt end
or an
interval
of some sort, as though each number is being created momentarily
from
nothingness rather than representing something that is changing
as in the case
of the
Sand...
This represents
a dramatic form of
change
that is not the case with the the movement of sand and is less
of a case
with the
clock's circular motion...
With the notion
of counting
associated with time's motion, motion has never been more
horizontal rather
than
circular
The notion that
thoughts could exist
in a
time-order numerical mode (i.e. 1+1+1+1+1+1+1 infinitely) gives
rise to the
notion of
The Mind's Infinity (Time).
The possibility
of a given thought
being
somehow separate from another nourishes the possibility of a
mental
interval
of some sort made out of emptiness or zero-ness similar to the
space
interval
that separates between two objects.
In other words,
1+1+1+1+1
= 101010101...
We have spoken
of a hierarchal order
that
rules the nature of Forms.
We've also
spoken of how the
priority
and importance in such order is measured by the degree to which
each
form
seems to influence perceptual possibility.
For example, we
compared the Form
Red to
the Form Apple, and we discovered that the Form Red projects its
presence
upon many
objects - practically as many red objects as there are in space,
while
the Form
Apple projects a presence only upon limited and specific
objects in
space
referred to as apples.
We concluded
from this example that
the Form
Red somehow prevails over the Form Apple or have a more special
status
in the
hierarchy of forms.
We have also
examined how this
hierarchy
of forms seems to integrate on the perceptual level in an
inseparable
mode in
such a way where the Form Red enters or layers upon the Form
Apple and
cannot
possibly be extracted from it...
On the other
hand, we've discussed
how the
Form One is even more important and prevalent than the Form Red
since it
somehow
enters any perceptual activity i.e.any identity that rises
partake its
unity-of-form from the Form One...
What is
ultimately concluded from
examining
the nature of this order is basically: The more a Form enters
the
basic
mathematics of perceptual mechanism and possibility, the more it
prevails
over
other forms.
One further
observation is worth
mentioning at this point is that also: the more a Form prevails,
the more
inseparable it is from the basic matrix or fabric of the
perceptual experience
-
accordingly the more it seems to resemble less and less the
numerical 1 and
instead
resemble more and more a much higher form of oneness.
For example, The
Form Apple have
more
defined extremities in space
& time
than the Form Red which is almost
most of
the time parasitic upon other forms. The define extremities of
the Apple
represent
the concept of numerical isolation better than the form red-ness
or
form
roundness do. The latter forms layer upon object in a less
extractable mode
and do
not accurately reflect numerical isolation.
Ultimately, the
Form One has the
least
defined extremities in space, and it bares the least resemblance
to the
numerical
1, that it almost resembles everything and nothing at same time,
and
it layers
so deeply upon the matrix of perceptual experience that all
other
forms
seem to disguise it to the extent that it has no numerical
presence at
all....
Like light it is,
it
permeates vision of all objects yet never stand out as an object
in
itself...
We can go on
forever providing
examples
that would further translate this
nature
of the order that rules The
Hierarchy
of Forms.
However, for now, it is important to bring our effort
into
conclusive grounds that bare relevancy to what
zero-ness
amounts to
conceptually.
One could say
that the same order
than
rules the nature of Forms on the physical level, rules the
nature of Forms
mentally,
because
The
Physical
translates
The
Mental.
Thoughts
integrate in mind and layer
upon each
other in a mode that reflects this
order
of importance.
They
integrate mentally with one another in the
same way
as greenness and roundness integrate within the apple in space.
A thought Y
could carry
another
thought X within it in the same way an apple carries greenness
within it.
In other words,
thoughts are inter-connected to each other in a nuclear mode
that reflects the nature of Forms.
According to the above diagram, conceiving of Thought A
= conceiving of Thought B C D & E simultaneously.
However, the numerical possibility that allows for
distinguishing between a particular Thought C and another
Thought E in mind gives the impression that
thoughts could be separated from each by some imaginary space or
interval.
This
form of separation however does not carry any Imperative
Logic anymore than noticing the redness in an apple
separately from the roundness is
logically essential to noticing the apple itself. On the
contrary, it could be
considered an element of distraction that (for a second) seems
to enforce its presence on the expense of perceiving the
totality of the apple itself.
A
given
thought could be distinguished in mind from another thought by
virtue of a certain
uniqueness similar to how greenness is distinguished
from
roundness on the perceptual level.
In
this sense, the Frame-of-oneness responsible for this
given thought
standing out NUMERICALLY on the mental level, is no more
separable from the thought itself than the 3-dimensional
silhouette of an apple in space is separable from the
apple's totality.
In
other words, the 3-D extremities a given object in space is not
a mere frame to this object as The Numerical Possibility
seems to project. This form is inseparable from the object
itself and is an essential constituent of the object's
expressive identity and not merely a dead frame that
accounts for the object's statistical or numerical presence.
However, what we are after here is not what accounts for
any
thought's numerical possibility in mind, but rather what
accounts for
zero-ness
in Mind. The question is:
Is
Zero-ness translated mentally
by:
a
state of an absolute absence of
thought
or is
it merely translated
through:
the
thought of zero-ness itself
or
perhaps:
the
presence of a thought that
rises
as numerically distinct only in terms of its lack of content?
And if
the
numerical frame
is
supposedly comprised of the extremities of a given object (and
hence is
inseparable from the object's expressive or meaningful form),
what makes
zero-ness,
which supposedly should mean the
absence
of
content,
enforce a numerical
presence
in
mind?
In
other words: what could possibly
account for the presence of a
thoughtless thought
or a
frameless
frame
or an
imageless image
in
mind?
Would
such thought, if it existed
mentally, be really
a
particular thought in mind.
or
would it be
the
thought of a mental possibility
that
justifies its existence by the mere
possibility of being thinkable?
Seeing
how thoughts integrate on the
mental
level in a nuclear mode in such a way where there is
no
actual
mental
vacancy
or
interval between a given Thought B and a given Thought
C that
could possibly justify any directional or sequential timely
numerical
order
of 101010101010101010,
and
knowing that such interval would be similar
to the
imaginary frame
vision
places around
the
eyes
or
the
nose
that
belong to
the
same face,
which
in no way prevents the whole
face
from happening all at once,
one
cannot but questions the validity of
numerical logic on the mental level.
The
mere fact that one could
focus
attention on the eyes does not rule out the immediate presence
of all the other
facial
features and most importantly the face altogether.
In
other words, there is no real
interval of emptiness or zero-ness between the eyes and the
nose, neither is
there
such a thing as
zero-state-of-thought
that
separates between a
particular thought and another.
The
mind, even when thinking of
nothing, it would still be thinking of something.
Consequently, Forms not only are inseparable on the physical
level but also on the mental level as well.
This
numerical possibility which we spoke of earlier as
impossible on the perceptual level, turns out to be not
necessarily an inherent nature of the conceptual realm either,
However, it seemingly appears more mysterious and vague on the
level of thoughts than it is on the physical level, not because
it exists mentally anymore than it does physically, but because,
mentally, it has more fertile grounds for harnessing the
deceptive logic of its illusory presence.
The
logic behind this premise will be gradually exposed as we go
along introducing The Unique Fifth Science.
For
now, it is enough to understand that the underlying logic
that supports the possibility of zero-ness relies on the
possibility of the existence of some form of absolute
opposition or absolute repellency in such a way where
the two opposites are so intolerant to each other that
one must delete the other, and while its harder for such
possibility to translate perceptually (since nothing in nature
out there resembles such possibility not even space), it is less
hard to translate conceptually. For, the realm of thought is the
only realm where possibilities could enforce a potential
presence without necessary materializing in actuality.
Understanding this point is Key to understanding the logic of
Possibility which will be surveyed in greater depth in
The Unique Fifth Science...
If
zero-ness has no absolute form of
its
own, and there is no such thing as a mental emptiness or
deletion of
thoughts, then zero-ness in mind must build its delusive
presence based on some
relative form of numerical
emptiness
which
emerges along with the
emergence of the numerical
fullness
manifesting through any meaningful
thought.
Assuming that a given Thought F emerges in mind (in the same way
as an object emerge in space) possessing a numerical
presence and occupying a particular mental space at a given
time; and, considering how zero-ness on the perceptual level
translates through a ghost-like object that somehow resides
underneath the actual object in space (taking the exact form of
that object and utilizing its exact same 3D extremities),
what
then would zero-ness be in relation to this mental numerical
object referred to as "Thought"?
What
accounts for a particular mental hollowness that comes on the
exact particular form of a given thought and only stays as long
as this given thought stays and ultimately disappears with it?
The
answer should be something like an exactly similar thought
to
Thought F that utilizes the unique particularity of
thought F strictly in a numerical
sense
to sustain its illusive presence.
The
underlying logic that supports such cognitive behavior is a
psychological belief in the irrelevancy between the
numerical frame of a thought and its unique content or
expressive form that makes it rise numerically in the first
place. Again, this is like saying that the 3-d silhouette of an
apple in space (which constitutes its numerical frame of
presence) has nothing to do with the apple itself.
This
absurd assertion in itself translates the logic of zero-ness,
because zero-ness thrives on a form of separateness
between the extremities of the object (which constitute
its numerical frame) and the full matrix of the object
(that constitutes its meaningful identity i.e. its
expressive and dynamic form which reflects how this object fit
within the matrix-of-forms).
This
virtual separateness doesn't really exist save in the
cognitive assumption of its existence itself, and assuming
it exists is like assuming that non-existence exists... Just
because the mind is capable of wording a given thought like
non-existence exists does not mean that their is life or
meaning in this thought, and thinking that something
is possible does not make it carry the element of
possibility if there is no mental image to support such
possibility. However, the mind is capable of breathing
form into hollow thoughts the more it is numerically
pressured to focus on those thoughts as present, not knowing
that the only agency that provides those thoughts their presence
is the activity of thinking itself ... In other words,
it is like assuming that a thoughtless thought
could
stand and hold on its own and in itself by the mere fact that
there is a numerical
possibility.
Thus,
the
Zero-State-of-a-Thought
F
would have to be: an underlying NO that emerges with the
numerical emergence of thought F. The possibility of this NO
emerging is a default of language....
The
underlying logic that supports this absurd assumption is
basically: The Possibility of the numerical frame existing on
its own without the thought's content, which indirectly
means the possibility of the content not-existing.
The
logic of this assertion implies that the frame is what
brings the
meaning into existence and it has the power to delete the
meaning as
well.
To
comprehend the absurdity of such
logic: imagine
that this hollow or empty object underneath the 3-D form of a
particular apple x in space could exist independently
of
this apple's existence.
In
such case, what would make this particular space any different
from the
infinite space surrounding it?
Accordingly, how could the Mind authenticate the presence
of a
thought that has no particular content - a Thought that
justifies its hollow particularity by the mere possibility of
engaging the mind in the possibility of thinking of it?...
Consequently, if the
zero-state of a given Thought Y is to mean anything on
the cognitive level, it would
have
to mean nothing but a NEGATION or a NEGATIVE THOUGHT
that
negates thought Y only by virtue of its numerical possibility,
yet it claims as
though
it has the power to negate the expressive form or the
meaningful content itself which is impossible. For,
how could it
possibly negate Thought Y in terms of content or
expressive value when in reality
it is
totally blind to such dimension-of-presence? It
only comes hand in hand
with
numerical awareness...
In
conclusion:
anytime the Mind focuses on a given thought's
numerical dimension treating it in terms of its dead
weight-of-presence inside the
mental
space, the mind is automatically distracted from its dynamic
power as an
expressive form that fits within a greater Matrix-of-Meaning,
and instead, the
Mind's
vision becomes divided and fragmented by intervals supposedly
made of
numerical emptiness ZERO-NESS.
The
whole process cognitively starts in the form of
I
a
aware that I am thinking of thought Y
and
ends in the form of
I
doubt the
content of thought Y
just in virtue of the mere possibility of thinking that Thought
Y could've not existing
numerically...
From
here, the more the mind lingers upon
the
numerical presence of a given Thought, the more the Mind is
distracted and
deprived from the expressive power of this thought, the more the
mind sustains a
numerical awareness that nourishes the role of the Zero: MENTAL
DOUBT - that NO that comes in all forms
and
shapes and degrees of negativity
...
This
calls
for a cognitive discrimination between A Thought that
Frames Meaning and A Thought
that
Frames a Frame Devoid of Meaning:
A Conscious Thought and A Behavioral
Thought...
A
Conscious Thought
frames
an image made of actual identity that fit
within
a greater Matrix-of-Meaning, sort of like the way that
roundness fits
within
the Matrix of the Apple's Identity etc...
A
Behavioral Thought, on the other hand, is devoid of any image.
It is a JUDGMENTAL
thought that assumes the validity of THE BEHAVIOR OF JUDGING
ONENESS or IDENTITY based on the
possibility of the existence of ZERO-NESS,
which is the biggest and most
sever
judgment in time, because it judges Existence for bearing the
possibility
of
Non-Existing, giving birth to the most original and deceptive
form of
contrariety that later develops into more religious forms like
Good
&
Evil
etc..
In
reality, we've already shown how the very nature of existence is
intolerant
to any
form of contrariety... For example, An APPLE is an APPLE. One
cannot
judge
apple in terms of being what it is. In this sense it is neutral
to judgment. To
say
Not Apple or to mentally add the Word NO to
An Apple does not delete the meaning of the Apple or alter
anything
in the
Expressive Form of the Apple. It rather merely uses the
deceptive empty appearance of
Space
to endorse the possibility of the emptiness of the APPLE
...
Consider the Thought: I am Happy in this place...
The
ZERO-STATE-OF-THIS-THOUGHT is the Thought: I am thinking that
the Thought I am
Happy
in this Place exists.
This
automatically Implies that I am over-thinking
the
Thought that I am happy in this place, which in turn implies
that I doubt the existence of such thought, otherwise I
would
not over-think the obvious...
However can I doubt the meaning of
happiness itself?
Well,
somehow in mind, doubting the Thought that I am Happy is
confused for doubting the existence of Happiness itself which
implies the possibility of a form of
Judgment over Identity
which is logically impossible...
I am
thinking that the Thought I
am
Happy in this place exists
= Happiness doesn't exist
which
is similar to saying An APPLE and then adding a
Judgmental NO to it as
though
this magic NO could delete or change anything about the
Form Apple itself
...
To put
it in
simpler terms, the
Negatory Thought
engages the mind in a
behavioral mode referred to as
DOUBT,
while
the Authentic Thought silently
projects a Meaningful Image which promotes mental vision an
not mental behavior, and learning how to differentiate
between the two is KEY to comprehending the Magic of the
Unique Fifth Science.
The
Negatory Thought behaves as though it has absolute power over
the
content of the Images that it negates just by the mere fact that
the Imageless Image of
ZERO
or NONEXISTENCE is confused in mind for being an actual opposite
to existence
and
thus is confused for being meaningful in itself independent of
existence.
However, if you compare the opposition between two meaningful
opposites like Black
&
White
to the
opposition between Existence
&
Non-existence
, you will discover how the former
relies
on Meaningful Imagery while the latter don't.
Black
& White are relatively opposite and not absolutely opposite.
They are related to each other by their Species-of-Origin :
COLOR
While,
on the other hand, the other form of opposition is devoid
of any Supportive Imagery, and simply relies
on an
Imaginary Hollowness or Emptiness that cannot even begin
to be conceived and nothing resembles it in nature - not even
space...
IN
CONCLUSION:
Remember then: MENTAL JUDGMENT is a the metaphysical
origin of error, and it all starts with
JUDGING THE NUMERICAL ONE FOR EXISTENCE.
This
judgment reduces The Meaningful Identity
into a
Numerical Value and subjecting this identity to Doubt
through The Possibility to Negate
numerical presence.
It transforms Lively Images full of IDENTITY into Dead
Numerical Frames devoid of any Expressive Power - sucking the
life out of those
image,
like a frame that suddenly distract attention away from the
painting
preventing vision from entering its world.
This
negative Power of
Suction behaves in the same way as BLACK behaves when hit by
sunlight. It absorbs
the
light instead of reflecting it into further servitude of SIGHT
or VISION.
MENTAL
JUDGMENT is originally based on an absurd logic that
assumes that NON-EXISTENCE and EXISTENCE are real opposites just
because they
can
come together in MIND as such, when in reality: take a look
around you... EXISTENCE is so
prevalently and obviously beyond contrariety,
and it
is more related to
Identity
and
not to any
Confirmative Numerical Presence...
Also
remember:
there
is no such thing as absolute opposition... Contrariety is not
absolute. It originates from the term
contrast
which
does not mean repelling opposition or separation the the
absolute sense that non-existence or zero-ness imply. We've
already gave an example how two colors
of the
same spectrum may contrast; this does not render them opposites
in any
sense... White & Black contrast to the maximum
-
to the
extent that they
are
referred to
as
opposites; however in essence they are both colors. They cannot
be
opposites beyond relativity. White could become more black and
black could become more white, and they could
both
meet at the middle grey area in between...
On the other hand, the
Absoluteness of the OPPOSITION implied between 1 vs. 0 or
existence vs. nonexistence is rather based on an image of
ABSOLUTE SEPARATION and
not
contrast; because, only such separation could possibly carry the
implication
that
there is such nature of opposition...
Opposition in this absolute sense claims that there
is
some form of contrast that could render two entities opposites
only because
they
are opposites and
beyond any element of relativity. There is no SPECIES that could
ever
measure up for the degree of opposition implied in The
Duality of Existence vs. Non-existence or provide for
any explanation as to why
or how
such
opposites oppose each other besides the possibility of
opposition itself. Plus, such relativity, if it were to
exist, it would challenge the absoluteness of their
opposition...
So, to
assume the existence of Absolute
Opposition is to basically assume the existence of a Form of
Eternal Separation... There is no
such
conceivable image of separation, neither is there anything in
space and time that bares any resemblance to such image, because
any two separate objects
in
space would still
have
Space as a relative element in common and thus, cannot be
separate beyond relativity... Two apples on
a
plate are relatively two separate objects; however, each relates
to the space it occupies in an exactly similar sense that
renders it numerical and
accountable...
SO
what could ever be separate in the
Absolute sense of separation?
Remember then that the Image of Separation originated
from the concept of TWO-NESS (The Origin of Number).
We've
already defined two-ness as being the byproduct of
a
relative
space
or interval around an object's extremities
that accounts for the object's
numerical possibility and which the mind registers as a
ZERO-NESS in relation to
ONENESS or a form of EMPTINESS RELATIVE TO THE OBJECT'S
OCCUPATIONAL PRESENCE.
Could
Opposition base its Absoluteness on such relative concept and
yet remain Absolute?
Could
the
conception of TWO-NESS transcend the conception of ONENESS so as
to provide
grounds to negating ONENESS and giving form to the existence of
Eternal Separation?
We've
already demonstrated how the Zero and the One relate to one
another by virtue of
the
deceptive nature of Space which gives rise to both of them. Does
the space within the occupational presence of a given object
differs in
such
drastic manner than the space outside the object's occupational
presence that it cannot ever be a conjoining element? And if
not, how can the logic of
Separation be totally based on the nature of such conjoining
element..
In
conclusion, separation in the sense of
absolute opposition
between two entities is a
cognitive default based on an Ancient Erroneous Mental
Judgment...
This
Interior cognitive misconception is
paralleled by an Exterior misperception that influences
how we see reality and the objects and events that falls
within...
We
tend to view the contrast highlighted by an
object
or event's relative interaction with space & time within the
context of
separation and segregation... This automatically renders the
perceived object or event as a numerical one and the particular
space surrounding it as an
existing numerical emptiness... Consequently, the object is
translated into 1 and the emptiness into another 1. Thus, 0
& 1
are
both
numerical entities that are in the Truth-in-Finality nothing but
1
& 1
which
is
what TWO means: The Origin of Separation and Number...
This
maxim will be explored in more depth later. For now, keep in
mind that any form of polarity or contrariety that falls within
the
context of TWO-NESS cannot contrast in any absolute sense.
Finally, this leaves no sense to the Language of Absolute
Opposition which accounts for
the
Mind's most ancient and dangerous metaphysical illnesses, beyond
being
a form
of negativity for the
sake
of negativity
and in the absolute and obvious presence of positivity.
This is the DARK
side of FREEWILL - ELSE KNOWN AS THE DARK SIDE OF THE MIND. On
one hand NUMBER constitutes the
mathematics of possibility and on the other hand it is in-seeded
with the logic of
SELF-DESTRUCTION...
KNOWLEDGE is based on this possibility, yet it is like an
arrow
which if it shakes a milligram upon embarking it drifts miles
away from
target
upon landing....
FOR
NOW IT IS IMPORTANT TO
NOTE
THAT THE MIND IS FREE TO JUDGE ANYTHING INTO EXISTENCE - THE
MIND JUDGES
THINGS
INTO EXISTENCE THINKING THAT IT IS JUDGING THINGS THAT ALREADY
EXIST
WHEN
JUDGING IS THE ACT OF CREATING DESTINY - EMOTIONS ARE HELPLESS
IMAGES BROUGHT ON AND SWEPT AWAY
BY THE
STRONG CURRENTS OF JUDGMENTS YET THEY SHAPE OUR DESTINY AND
TRANSLATE HEAVEN AND HELL
The
MIND (The Internal SUN)
The Form One and
the Forms:
As already made
clear, anytime the mind gathers conception of anything, the mind
somehow utilizes an innate knowledge of the Form ONE in order to
identify the Object of Conception i.e. to put it within a
Frame-of-Unity (else referred to as Identity or What-ness).
On the
perceptual level, it has also been revealed how the mind somehow
translates this numerical frame externally by isolating
the extremities of objects - reducing them into numerical values
responsible for our perceptual awareness of the statistical
presence of those objects.
However, the
mechanism of such activity is not yet clear.
Does the Mind
(as The Knower) projects or superimposes the Form ONE
from the inside outwards towards a soup of physical substance
causing this soup to somehow reflect this Oneness and as a
result objects emerge from this soup resonating with meanings
and identities?
Or,
Is this soup of
physical substance already made up of numerical objects that
project their identities inwards unto the mind and the mind's
role (in such case) is to simply register those numerical
identities using its own interior "database" i.e. Its Innate
Knowledge of The Form One and The Realm of Forms
in general.
If the Mind (as The Knower)
projects its nature outwards towards the Object of
Knowledge, then this Projection
would have to be an extension of the internal realm of Mind,
perhaps in a way similar to how light rays are extensions of the
Sun. It would have to transport the internal power of mind
outwards causing the Exterior Realm to reflect this power, and
as a result the Physical Substance becomes mental in nature,
resonating with the mind's substance (numerical identities and
Forms that ultimately reflect the Form One which has no presence
in nature outside the mind).
As for the the
second possibility, the Form One, according to it, would have to
exist out there independently of the Mind and would have to some
how be present in each and every object. This is
impossible....The other flaw that haunts this possibility is:
in assuming that the mind could register in this Form One
through an innate ability to recognize it, it somehow appears to
adopt an Empirical Logic yet still admit to the mind's
ability to process numerical identities utilizing innate
knowledge of a Concept that does not exists in nature
outside the Mind: The Concept One.
The logic of
such assumption is self defeating. On one hand it seems to
presume that knowledge of the Form One is innate, and on the
other hand it holds on to the assumption that knowledge of
everything else is empirical.
In any case, the
most important difference between the two case-scenarios is that
the former presents the Mind as an Active Giver while the
latter depicts the Mind as a Passive Receiver, and this
difference is really what distinguishes the Innate Logic from
the Empirical One.
The Sun & The
Form ONE:
If there is
anything in nature out there that resembles such Active Giver -
A Giver that projects its internal power over the external realm
causing it to resonate with this power and translate it, it must
be the SUN. Understanding this point is key to understanding why
the SUN plays such an essential role in Plato's Philosophy.
Plato gave
special significance to the Sun in both, his Myth of the Sun
and Myth of the Cave.
According to
Plato, the Sun is represents the Ultimate Good, because
it is in pure harmony and complete servitude to The Gnostic
Cause of all Causes: KNOWLEDGE.
The SUN 's
nature is to constantly emanate LIGHT, and when light hits
objects, it transfers those objects into VISIBLE EXTREMITIES
vibrating with shape, color and meaning - not only providing
them with the element that verifies their PERCEPTUAL IDENTITY,
but also transferring them into tools of translation that
ultimately serve to translate the nature of the agency of
sight itself.
Remember,
according to the Gnostic Law, everything is created for a
reason layered upon reason, all of which ultimately ascend to
reveal the nature of Consciousness.
The SUN, in
Plato's myth is symbolic of the Wholly Mind, and the
Gnostic significance of its presence in this world does not stop
at only making things visible to the immediate eyes as it
appears to be present for, but rather, it also translates this
very Gnostic Truth that we are revealing right here right
now: how the Mind makes objects Conceptually POSSIBLE is
translated in how the sun makes them perceptually possible...
The MIND, like
the SUN, emanates the AGENCY OF SIGHT, and this AGENCY
transfers the physical realm into a realm that resembles its
nature - a realm where there exists a Sun that makes things
visible, translating what it is like for the mind to make things
identifiable...
The Sun emanates
the most essential substance of life, Light, which not
only apparently is instrumental in the perceptual mechanism, but
also on many other levels.
For example, on
a biological level, consider the role sunlight plays in plant
life by allowing for the production of chlorophyll, or in human
life by fortifying bones with vitamin D, or on an earthly level
by keeping earth at a temperature that permeates life in
general etc....
However, Plato
associated Existence to A State of Mental Vision prior to
being A State of Physical or Biological Being, and man to
Plato is An Eye prior to being A Hand or any other
Limb...
The logic of
this Platonic axiom could be traced back to the Gnostic
Nature of the Cause of Existence. As already revealed, in
Gnosis, existence = knowledge, and anything beyond knowledge,
lacks what it takes to exist.
Thus, the
significance of the Sun's existence in Plato's world is more
reflected in the role that the sun plays in permeating vision
rather than in supporting biological life in general. Thus,
Plato concentrated on the element that relates the Sun to Sight:
light.
Light is
apparently a key agency in the mechanism of perception. However,
according to Plato, the reality of perception altogether
reflects a much higher reality which is
conception...Accordingly, the role that the Sun plays in
perception is symbolic of a much important role - the role that
the mind plays in conception; and if there is one major reason
that justifies the sun's existence in the first place, it must
be precisely this role. In short, without the Sun, we would
not know what we need to know about the mind.
If the Sun, to
Plato, represents the Mind, it logically follows that
Sunlight must then represent the Power of the Mind.
Sunlight to
vision, more than acting like a flash to a camera, it is a
rather a perceptual representation of how The Mental Power
works.
If there is a
Mental Form that reflects the engine of such power, it
must be The Form One:
Sunlight
externally (on the perceptual level) serves to translate to
human understanding the nature of the Form One internally (on
the conceptual level).
The Form One,
in the same way as light makes things externally visible, makes
forms internally identifiable,
Despite its
obviousness and prevalence, light is completely disguised behind
the very appearance of the objects that it permeates into sight
- disguised in such a way that it is never an object of sight in
itself; and similarly, the Form One, as an Identity in itself,
is disguised behind the many Identities or Mental Forms it
permeates into conception...
It stands
silently on the top of the Hierarchy of Forms, and without it no
identity could ever emerge into conceptual or perceptual
existence; yet it resembles light in its forbidden simplicity,
residing in everything without being anything in particular.
The overflowing
nature of sunlight conceals the Sun's extremities in space in
the same way as the nature of the Form One conceals the Mind's
Presence; so much so that the Mind's presence is narrowed down
to the presence of those numerical entities highlighted by
The Form One which we refer to as thoughts, as if the
Mind is a numerical container of some sort..
The Mental Eye
is so pre-occupied by the MANY forms projected into sight by The
Form One, that it is almost constantly oblivious to the nature
of the Projector and the Mechanism of Projection.
In addition to
being the star of his myths, Plato as already mentioned,
compared the SUN to the Ultimate Good. He did so in
reference to the GIVING role that the Mind (as a Knower) plays
in the world of knowledge, and to what knowledge stands for in
the Truth-in-Finality.
Conventionally,
To Give implies To Loose something by sending it
forth to a receiver who in turn Gains something. However,
in the Unique Case of the Sun, the Sun as a Giver, is not
lessened in anyway by the light it Gives, neither does the
Receptivity to Light makes the Receiver gain anything
beyond itself and resonating with its own truth.
Light to the Sun
is not something that the sun looses but rather it never really
departs the Sun in the first place, and it remains as long as
the sun exists. In other words, light is essentially what makes
the Sun a Sun, and To shine is an inherent nature of the
sun and not something that could be acquired or lost so long as
the sun remains the sun.
In other words,
Giving Light, in the sun's case, is not an intentional
act, and understanding this point is skeletal to understanding
the logic of The Fifth Science.
In the case of
an intentional act of giving, the action is preceded by an
intention, and it comes latent to the Actor. While in the case
of Sunlight, the Action comes hand in hand with the Actor
without any timely order of precedence, in such a way that the
Actor and the Action are both ONE. The action describes the
Actor, and the nature of the Actor appears in the Action.
Thus, the Sun
does not give light by sending it froth outside itself, but
rather by simply being a sun and resonating with meaning and
form, and this is precisely what Giving really means in
the Gnostic Finality. This is precisely what Christhood
stands for in Gnostic Christianity. Christ gave what he
gave to humanity by simply being Christ and not by acting like a
Christ or acting like The Savior. He simply walked the
path of salvation and humanity followed this path. He did not
intend to play the role of The Savior;
He is the person with the least
tendency to play such role and the most immune against such
tendency, and this is the simple truth that made him what he is
in thy Father's Eyes - The Simple Truth that skipped the mind of
The Embodied Zero - The Devil who refused to bow down to
the Earthliness projected by such Heavenly Law.
Remember then
that: in the Gnostic Finality, To Give is to simply allow
yourself to be What you Are and to allow your Thoughts,
Expressions & Actions to resonate with the Power of your
Interior on every level just like the sun shines 360 degrees.
This conception
of giving not only sheds a light on what giving authentically
means but reveals also what receiving means as well.
A conventional
receiver receives by absorbing what is given to him by the
conventional Giver.
On the other
hand, an authentic receiver reflects back what is given by
shining with the Power of the Giver, in the same way as objects
lit by the sun, reflect the sun's power by shining with form,
shape and meaning.
Receiving in the
Gnostic dictionary, is basically the Power of Reflecting the
nature of the Giver.
Physical objects
lit into existence by the sun could be narrowed down to
reflections of the sun. Like photos, they are Representatives
or Messengers of Light prior to being what they are in
particular. Similarly, mental forms are Representatives of
The Form One in disguise before being what they are.
In the same way
as light superimposes its nature upon the physical substance
causing it to shine with The Perceptual Possibility, the
Form One superimposes it nature upon the mental substance
causing it to resonate with The Conceptual Possibility.
The Mind, like
the sun, has the power to transform any Object into a Mental
Object. The External Realm responds to the Mind Power by
projecting the nature of the Mind.
However, as
we've mentioned before, this process of projection or
translation, the more it departs from the Object of Translation,
the more it becomes prone to the defaults of translation:
Error and Deception.
Accordingly, as
the External Realm translate the Internal Realm of Mind, it also
translates the deceptive role that the Mind plays as A
Giver. The External Realm, by reflecting such role, it appears
as though it is the GIVING AGENCY THAT EMANATES MENTAL
IMAGES INTO VISION and not the other way around.
This breaths
life into the basic logic behind empiricism, which assumes that
knowledge is acquired through images projected by the physical
realm towards the Mind, when they are simply late translations
of the Mind and have no progressive life of their own without
the Mind...
The physical or
external realm, in appearing as The Role Player or The
Projector of Images, is simply reflecting the nature of the
real Projector, the MIND, GIVING THE DECEPTIVE INVERTED NOTION
THAT KNOWLEDGE IS ACQUIRED THROUGH AN EXTERNAL EMPIRICAL
ACTION...
Thus, THE MIND
(which represents The Nature of Christhood) again pauses
as the double-edged sword which is in itself simultaneously the
cause of KNOWLEDGE and the cause of DECEPTION.
To comprehend
this idea better, consider how in a Dream State a VIRTUAL
EMPIRICAL REALM is fully created from scratch in response to
a mental activity referred to as dreaming which is
completely and absolutely MENTAL... The only difference is that
in a Dream-State the MIND stands out clearly as THE CREATOR OF
THIS EXPERIENCE, because the dreamer never physically leaves his
place or open his eyes, while in the WAKING STATE things take on
more of a deceptive edge.
To think that in
the Gnostic logic everything is created for a reason that layers
upon other layers of reason all of which ultimately relate to
knowledge, one of the innermost layers-of-reason as to why
DREAMS exist must be to TRANSLATE THIS HIDDEN POWER OF THE MIND
TO CREATE THE EMPIRICAL REALITY - SOMETHING THAT THE
WAKING-STATE FAILS TO TRANSLATE AS FAITHFULLY...
At this point,
it is important to remind you that the notion of THE TRANSLATION
BEING UNFAITHFUL TO THE OBJECT TRANSLATED supports the basic
logic behind METAPHYSICAL ERROR, otherwise referred to as EVIL.
Remember for now that what is religiously known as EVIL
originates basically from Defaults in Translation, and
all thoughts & actions in space and time ever identified as evil
are basically evil in terms of expressing WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE
TRANSLATION TO BE UNFAITHFUL TO THE MEANING IT TRANSLATES.
Consider Lying for example....
I shall stop for
now and leave you with your own thoughts on the material
presented so far....
In the 2nd Part
of this project, I will present to you the Unique Fifth Science
itself (Translated into English and explained to the best of my
ability). In it I shall go into greater depth revealing the
ancient hidden mechanism of perception and cognition
and the intricate mathematics of deception (unique
information never seen or heard of before).
How and When the
2nd part will be published depends upon your response to the
material presented in this part.
Upon reading the
Fifth Science, it will become clear to you exactly how the
material presented to you in this part fit just in the right
place to serve in bringing the unique logic of the Fifth Science
into comprehensible grounds.
Without
understanding the basic logic presented to you in this part,
there is little chance that The Fifth Science shall be
understood.
Thus, if the subject interests you enough and you feel that you
need further explanation or clarification on any point, please
do not hesitate to contact druzenet. Your comments and remarks
are also welcomed at anytime.
Best
Regards
Chadi 20/
